By Eightysix69
Wed Apr 25, 2018 4:34 pm
Wondering if anyone else has experienced this. I have searched the forums and could not find an answer to this question.
Let's say I record a sample, name it and assign it to drum1. Then I repeat that process 5 more times. I would then have 6 samples assigned to 6 pads. At this point if I were to record let's say 3 more samples, why is it that those newly recorded samples automatically take the name of the previously named samples? Why do they not appear as a new sample does as "sound00"? So I then have to rename the sample because it is a different sample than the name under which it appears. When I am renaming (in actuality just naming) that new sample it gives me the impression that it is going to replace the sample under whose name it appeared.
A similar issue is that, say I record 5 samples. They will be labeled "sound01" through "sound05", I then delete them. Then I record 3 more samples, they will appear as "sound06" through "sound08" when in actuality they are sounds 1 though 3 because I had deleted the previous 5 samples.
These are just a couple examples of the quirky things about the XLs ancient technology that make a super detail oriented person like me insane, confused and frustrated. Mind you I'm coming from a Ren and 2.2 software.
Let's say I record a sample, name it and assign it to drum1. Then I repeat that process 5 more times. I would then have 6 samples assigned to 6 pads. At this point if I were to record let's say 3 more samples, why is it that those newly recorded samples automatically take the name of the previously named samples? Why do they not appear as a new sample does as "sound00"? So I then have to rename the sample because it is a different sample than the name under which it appears. When I am renaming (in actuality just naming) that new sample it gives me the impression that it is going to replace the sample under whose name it appeared.
A similar issue is that, say I record 5 samples. They will be labeled "sound01" through "sound05", I then delete them. Then I record 3 more samples, they will appear as "sound06" through "sound08" when in actuality they are sounds 1 though 3 because I had deleted the previous 5 samples.
These are just a couple examples of the quirky things about the XLs ancient technology that make a super detail oriented person like me insane, confused and frustrated. Mind you I'm coming from a Ren and 2.2 software.