For Nubeing ( and the others reading )...
>1. I have a degree in record engineering.
For what it's worth so do lots of other people out there and possibly on this list too.
>2. I am a producer.
As are many people on this list.
>3. I have platinum records under my belt. (No I will not list them or tell >you who i really am)
Not all of us have to make a statement like this in order to qualify their opinion as a form of truth ...
>4. I know the MPC-60 and MPC 3000 like the back and front of my hand.
Excellent ... let us begin.
>It is not as easy as just hitting the sync button.
Never is...
>With the older MPCs we had to use a sync box because with the SMPTE >tracks that the MPC is supposed to generate there are drop outs.
The SMPTE receiver in the MPC60/MPC60MK2/MPC3000 is identical.
It is an OTARI IO series "receiver chip".
If you feel up to checking the hardware electronic configuration of this chip between said machines by reading circuit diagrams for same then feel free to do so.
>When you use an external SMPTE generator and attempt to read with the >60 it still experiences problems.
This was only ever the case when unfamiliar operators of both the external synchroniser equipment, tape machines and MPC60's got together in the same room and just thought everything would work first time around.
IE: Without being aware of what was causing the problem.
To keep it simple the original software releases for MPC60 machines contained a software error that caused slipping when syncing over extended periods of time via SMPTE ...
BTW: Early revisions of the Roland SBX synchroniser that was popular in the day had a similar bug.
FACT: Both of them were together a synergetic disaster that became for a short while the most mis-understood cause of most sync problems at that point in history.
This sync problem was rectified with later revisions of the MPC60/MPC60MK2 operating system. By later I mean 2.12 and higher. Of course the more recent Roger Linn design operating systems have no such problem either.
A fact also to confirm this can be found in later revision documentation.
>Even if you rent one (which always ends upbeing the worst) for your >session in the studio, there is still problems.
Rented one last weekend, locked it to a 30ips Studer A series multi track.
Even forgot to disable the noise reduction on track 24 which was being used for the SMPTE stripe.
Didn't slip or drift for the whole weekend session. Guess it was broke ?
>Like I said before the SMPTE or sync thing is just one of many limited >functions. Why limit yourself. IF YOU WANT TO SELL TRACKS and use >what the big boys use, the MPC 3000 is the standard PERIOD....
Yes ... I have an MPC3000 too.
>Where the sync to tape was concerned
>Why get a Pinto when you can get a 328i. If money is the issue then >keep rubbing nickels together until you got it but IT'S WORTH IT.
Where the sync to tape is concerned
Check your facts and be a little less vague with your opinions.