By TheOddfather
Tue Oct 25, 2016 8:54 am
I've been toying with chopping on my 3000 since I recently got it and trying many different methods listed on this site and other references. I certainly can chop by ear, but I thought I'd ask to see if I'm somewhat in the right about a theory I worked out. Let's say your first chop starts perfectly at 0.00 and the end of the first chop is perfectly at .5 (I know this 100% is never the case, but it's easier to explain this way.) At that point, if everything is basically on time in the sample, wouldn't the next chop be .5 away as well? So if the sample is 8 seconds long exactly you would start from 0 and do .5 increments all the way till pad 16 ends on 8 seconds? Like I said, I know it's never perfect numbers like that. But if chop 1 is .358 from start to end, then the next chop should be that same length, correct? Just wanted to see if anyone has messed with this method as well. Like I said chopping by ear is easiest, but I sort of like the mathematical aspect of it as well.