Share your knowledge on these two classic MPCs
By tresperros Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:41 pm
Hi guys,

maybe I am last morron, but I can't really get what it's for....
it's change a pitch obviousle, but I will appretiate someone's explanation.


cheers
User avatar

By 7 1 4 Beats Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:28 pm
I don't think you talking about the right compression. If I remember correctly the compression for the 3.50 is too compress your samples to save space but I may be wrong.

By tresperros Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:04 pm
holla mate,

does it mean bit reduction???

i don't get it.....
Mr Rohan.....where R ya ???

By mpc3000le Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:50 am
tresperros wrote:holla mate,


Mate ... :-)

tresperros wrote:does it mean bit reduction???


Sample rate reduction.

tresperros wrote:i don't get it.....


Explanation and examples following.

tresperros wrote:Mr Rohan.....where R ya ???


Right here.

Not in front of the net 24/7.

Same compression process that an MPC60 uses.

For the purpose of reducing a sample's size in memory.

Description:

Sample rate reduction.

44.1 KHz reduced to 22.05 KHz.

Sample rate is reduced by half there by:

1: reducing the memory foot print by half.
2: changing the pitch by half.
3: necessitating a need to re-tune the sample by an appropriate factor.
4: giving the result of a sample that was taken at 22.05 KHz.

The internal process used is identical to that of an MPC60 that runs OS 3.10E. ( with the exception of the actual final sample rate difference in each machine )

This recent thread:

http://www.mpc-forums.com/viewtopic.php?t=88156

Contains some good usage tips about the compression function courtesy of forum user "Deck Daddy".

Registered users are always welcome to contact me directly at http://www.mansell-labs.com with support enquiries.

Rohan.

By tresperros Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:38 pm
Hello,

Thanx mr R;)

i will try it again though


cheerio

Re:

By ssyniu Thu Sep 07, 2017 10:22 am
mpc3000le wrote:
tresperros wrote:holla mate,


Mate ... :-)

tresperros wrote:does it mean bit reduction???


Sample rate reduction.

tresperros wrote:i don't get it.....


Explanation and examples following.

tresperros wrote:Mr Rohan.....where R ya ???


Right here.

Not in front of the net 24/7.

Same compression process that an MPC60 uses.

For the purpose of reducing a sample's size in memory.

Description:

Sample rate reduction.

44.1 KHz reduced to 22.05 KHz.

Sample rate is reduced by half there by:

1: reducing the memory foot print by half.
2: changing the pitch by half.
3: necessitating a need to re-tune the sample by an appropriate factor.
4: giving the result of a sample that was taken at 22.05 KHz.

The internal process used is identical to that of an MPC60 that runs OS 3.10E. ( with the exception of the actual final sample rate difference in each machine )

This recent thread:

viewtopic.php?t=88156

Contains some good usage tips about the compression function courtesy of forum user "Deck Daddy".

Registered users are always welcome to contact me directly at http://www.mansell-labs.com with support enquiries.

Rohan.


Hi
I know It is an old thread but In stead of staring a new thread I will just follow on.Hopefully I will get an answer.
I would like to refer to this part of your advice :"3: necessitating a need to re-tune the sample by an appropriate factor."
Do I need to re-tune up or down in order to get initial pitch and how much roughly I need to re tune?
And Just one more thing If I will compress twice the same file,does that means it will reduce sample rate from 44.1 to 11.025 kHz??
Thank You in advance.