Technical questions for the MPC2000xl and the MPC2000
By distantb Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:53 pm
woah , sorry i didnt proof read befor i sent. What i meant to say was , does the original 2000 have better quality parts over the xl? And if so what parts.
By robtheviking Fri Sep 26, 2008 3:04 pm
Ive owned a 2000 for over 10 years, and made many songs with it. one thing i noticed about the the xl when it came out was the new data wheel. I never thought the design of it and how it was set up to scroll according to speed was very functional. of coarse its all what you become accustomed to, but i still think the 2000's 2 piece datawheel was much quicker and more accurate. a friend of mine had a 2000, and switched to the xl and always regretted it fo that reason. other than that, the xl has a tilt screen. not much else is that different.
User avatar
By 7 1 4 Beats Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:25 pm
robtheviking wrote:Ive owned a 2000 for over 10 years, and made many songs with it. one thing i noticed about the the xl when it came out was the new data wheel. I never thought the design of it and how it was set up to scroll according to speed was very functional. of coarse its all what you become accustomed to, but i still think the 2000's 2 piece datawheel was much quicker and more accurate. a friend of mine had a 2000, and switched to the xl and always regretted it fo that reason. other than that, the xl has a tilt screen. not much else is that different.



Yo you the same Rob The Viking that did Beats To Pillage & Conquer By Album?
By Nothelle Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:44 am
I bought a 2k classic a while back as my first mpc. I absolutely love it. The classic and xl (from what I have researched) are essentially the same unit. The xl just has a little bit more advantage (tilt screen, chopping etc.), and rightfully so being a newer unit. The only reason I am slightly leaning toward getting an xl is because since it doesn't have the tilt screen, I have to set my mpc down at a lower level, and I have a bad back so I can't be hunched over it for too long.
User avatar
By Lampdog Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:14 am
4 active programs for 2kxl (256pads), vice 1 active program for 2k (64pads).

autochromatic programs. time stretch. zone slice for 2kxl vs znedit for 2k.

Internal ATAPI connection on 2kxl motherboard..
User avatar
By JUKE 179r Wed Oct 08, 2008 7:05 pm
Lampdog wrote:4 active programs for 2kxl (256pads), vice 1 active program for 2k (64pads).

autochromatic programs. time stretch. zone slice for 2kxl vs znedit for 2k.

Internal ATAPI connection on 2kxl motherboard..


and...
The XL sequencer memory was increased by 3x from the 100,000 events to 300,000,
the XL can resample a sound with a different bit depth or sampling rate,
Samples stored on the XL doubled to 256,
The XL has file folder management,
it also has a Flash based OS so you don't have to load the OS from floppy disk everytime you switch on the XL.
User avatar

By Lampdog Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:01 am
And since it's all about the pads, stock grey/white xl pads are slightly softer than stock 2k pads.

I had a stock 2kxl, traded it for a 2kxlse2, pads were even slightly softer than stock 2kxl.