Technical questions for the MPC2000xl and the MPC2000
User avatar
By Lampdog Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:11 pm
Maybe it's just the nature of note repeat, to last only as many ticks as the set timing gives you.
User avatar
By tapedeck Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:24 pm
what am i missing here? if you are using note repeat, then you are basically telling the machine, 'i am going to hold down a pad and i want you to repeat the note while i do this'.
the key thing to notice is 'hold down the pad'.
how are you even doing different length note-offs, if you are holding down the pad?
User avatar
By Lampdog Fri Apr 29, 2016 5:26 pm
I think what op wants to do is note repeat with longer decay than note repeat may allow. Seems like note repeat wont decay past the next repeated note.

No matter what you manually set individual note decays (the page u pointed out in the manual). I don't think you missed anything, ur on point, as usual.

Like I aluded to earlier, maybe note repeat does that to prevent you from running out of polyphony when so many notes are repeated/generated successively. It's a guess.
By JVC Fri Apr 29, 2016 8:04 pm
I think it makes sense (at least to me) that note repeat function would assign the maximum possible value of duration. You are indeed holding key or keys when you are using note repeat, so what duration would be chopped up and recorded accordingly. (So 1/16th note (four note in one beat) on auto repeat, 96/4 = 24)

Long ago, I found out that if previous note is too long, and it reaches the next sequence of the same key, that sequence would be ignored (I think this is what Tapedeck mentioned above.) It makes sense (it is like try to press a key that hasn’t been released), but it took me a bit to figure out.
User avatar
By Harmoncj Sat Apr 30, 2016 1:16 am
tapedeck wrote:the key thing to notice is 'hold down the pad'.
how are you even doing different length note-offs, if you are holding down the pad?


It's possible to lift your finger off the pad before the next note, in some cases it makes an accent because the release is different than the decay... I know I'm hearing these effects while I'm performing it, and the recorded MIDI track doesn't sound the same unless I go back in and STEP EDIT the durations. The big clue is that it's probably the note with the lowest velocity, or the one next to it.

:worthy: thanks everyone for approaching this seriously, I realize now how insane and miniscule a caveat this is :lol:
I'm generally using STEP EDIT anyways,