
By ArKyve-31
Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:01 am
+1 to debauch, plus the mpc feels more organic imo, my software beats just dont have that soulful vibe i get from the hardware




séance wrote:Software never works correctly for me. Sequencing drums becomes harder due to latency despite a limitless ppqn. The mpc 1000 works well for me but I'd like to have better drum sequencing.

DPM wrote:i dont think i could ever go the software route. the only software music program in terms of production-making i've used is fruity loops and it feels to me like the program is pretty much making the song/beat FOR YOU. with hardware, you have total control over your track. YOU hit the pads, YOU play your own patterns, and software sound can never compare to REAL machine sounds IMO


Tracks wrote:séance wrote:Software never works correctly for me. Sequencing drums becomes harder due to latency despite a limitless ppqn. The mpc 1000 works well for me but I'd like to have better drum sequencing.
Sounds like a bad case of user error.
the cosmic pimp wrote:inthemix wrote:.... You shouda just told her about the non-existant sperm count and kept the MPC anyways![]()
Sorry buddy when she was walking down the stairs to leave at four in the morning ,I caved her head in with a lump hammer.Rung the pigs and said "THIS PROZZIE JUST BURGLED MY FLAT ON CRACK".
"HAVE YOU BATTERED HER"The piggy officer asked???????
"I pummeled her head seven times sir"I replied
"Nice work son ,we need more sociopaths on the force.would you like a career????".The copper asked
"No Thanks I am a pimp"
Copper said"We will collect the body in the morning .If you want to molest the corpse use a condom".

séance wrote:Tracks wrote:séance wrote:Software never works correctly for me. Sequencing drums becomes harder due to latency despite a limitless ppqn. The mpc 1000 works well for me but I'd like to have better drum sequencing.
Sounds like a bad case of user error.
96ppqn is rigid. I'd like more ppqn without doubling the tempo. There is no error, just limitation.