
By Antonym
Mon May 15, 2006 3:39 pm
you can get creative with post tuning eq, but otherwise there's little you can do. i have no secret technique, unfortunately.
however, when i'm sampling from records, i do multisample - but not the same hits of the same note. i just get a range of notes within a certain keysig and chop those up. then i rearrange using the same keysig (unless i pitch everything down or up) and same notes, but in a drastically different order. this is a kind of multisampling as well, since i'm not using the same sample and pitchign it for my melody.
also - i'm sure spirez can tear up autochromatic, and if i heard it in his beats i'd dig it. my earlier stance was one half joke, but personally i don't like the sound of it in my own music.
another important point to understand that it's all about reference. if you pitch 1 file and have others sampled from the same source nonpitched, the result will be mad obvious. however, if you pitch em all +, that's simply what the listener hears as the room noise. there's no problem with that.
however, when i'm sampling from records, i do multisample - but not the same hits of the same note. i just get a range of notes within a certain keysig and chop those up. then i rearrange using the same keysig (unless i pitch everything down or up) and same notes, but in a drastically different order. this is a kind of multisampling as well, since i'm not using the same sample and pitchign it for my melody.
also - i'm sure spirez can tear up autochromatic, and if i heard it in his beats i'd dig it. my earlier stance was one half joke, but personally i don't like the sound of it in my own music.
another important point to understand that it's all about reference. if you pitch 1 file and have others sampled from the same source nonpitched, the result will be mad obvious. however, if you pitch em all +, that's simply what the listener hears as the room noise. there's no problem with that.



