if however you mean that the 1k has a scan matrix and others have each pad scanned individually, then i could understand your reasoning.
from what i understand, this is the issue. on the mpc1000 pad circuit board, the 8 lower pads are scanned by 1 gadget, the other 8 by another. i BELIEVE the interlink models don't have this grouped scan type thing.
my theory is that they do not, and since they don't, that style of pad will always be better than what we have. whether or not we will notice this, or care, is another matter. when my mpc1000 pads function happily, i am plenty pleased with them and wouldn't need anything better (even though i'm making something better, but that's besides the point).
there will be no detectable difference in latency between the two types.
this is what i'm banking on when i release my performance pad kit. no matter what, FSRs without moving parts are gonna be btter than fsrs WITH moving parts, simply because of wear and tear. fortunately, that won't be the case with what i'm doing since the added support of the vinyl ala your idea as well as the silicon/vinyl sleeve spacer that goes in between the velostat and the sensor will give it significantly better hold. not to mention, the velostat squares will be bigger than those provided by akai.