By Bigmojo
Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:31 am
I started in electronic music when I was 15. Back in 1983 synthesizers did very very little, midi was unheard of and sampling existed only in dream setups.... plus guitarists and drummers hated us because apparently we only pressed a button and everything happened for us... They were the days.... 
I've been out of it for a while and my reasons for now looking into mpcs is because I just joined a tribute act who use a backing track with their drums on (it's essentially the audio L-R of a video file which is projected during the show). I don't like this too much because you can't sync things to it plus of course your backing is very set in stone.
MPCs as a live solution on the other hand strike me as flexible because they are so powerful that can sequence pretty much entire songs live.... this gives us
1) real time control over filters and it would really open everything out,
2) puts time code onto stage to sync anything else to... Lights, video, whatever.
3) If a band member cant make a gig we just make thier parts live int he sequencer and dont have to reproduce a different backing tape....
4) plus if we want to change something, we just change it.
So I've started trying tot achieve this in an affordable way... I bought three e-mu E4 samplers and am looking at a couple of rack synths (novation, proteus, Roland JV)
And of course I'm loooking at a 2500 or 5000 MPC...
This plus my live keyboards (virus TI and an emu longboard) and the other band members live synths etc and we should be set.
This is the way I understand things get done because of when I started in this... if notes get played, not loops...
I remember the MPC-60 being the answer to a lot of peoples prayers when it was announced.... meaning you could take a great deal of your studio sound into the live environment, and quite robustly, because you could use drum samples (actual hits not other peoples loops) program your patterns with them and program your synth sequences to all your other gear through midi. And you had the faders (q-link now I think) and pads could repeat notes .... Also very cool because linn was a name with a lot of cache because of the Linn Drums Mk1 and 2.
Just to make it more accessible as a solution, for those of us who didn't need akai's sampling because we had emulators or alsready had S900's or S612's Akai made the asq-10 sequencer as an option which I always understood as the sequencing guts of the MPC. The idea being that we could still take our synths and sequence parts live and not use pc's or laptops.
This is the way I always viewed the MPC, but these days the MPC seems to be viewed very very differently.
I read on here people asking what's best for "laying down beats" , what's best "for drums". but "not sequencing"... What is "laying down beats" !!! Is this programming you kick , hihat, snare etc patterns.... Or is it using what we used to call 'loops' ..... What do these expressions mean?
It seems the mpc has grown from being a sampler and sequencer into something more like a DAW, especially now with this cd recording and even 8 track recording...... Which is cool....
But with this emphasis on chopping up sections of other peoples music and re-interpreting it in your own piece, the MPC seems to be more of a dance music or hip-hop production tool rather than a sequencer / sampler for musicians. Massively powerful etc.....
Or is it that now they are so powerful, comparatively to what was possible at the time the IDEA of an MPC was born, that they can be used in entirely different ways.
I'm wondering if I need a modern mpc at all.
I've been out of it for a while and my reasons for now looking into mpcs is because I just joined a tribute act who use a backing track with their drums on (it's essentially the audio L-R of a video file which is projected during the show). I don't like this too much because you can't sync things to it plus of course your backing is very set in stone.
MPCs as a live solution on the other hand strike me as flexible because they are so powerful that can sequence pretty much entire songs live.... this gives us
1) real time control over filters and it would really open everything out,
2) puts time code onto stage to sync anything else to... Lights, video, whatever.
3) If a band member cant make a gig we just make thier parts live int he sequencer and dont have to reproduce a different backing tape....
4) plus if we want to change something, we just change it.
So I've started trying tot achieve this in an affordable way... I bought three e-mu E4 samplers and am looking at a couple of rack synths (novation, proteus, Roland JV)
And of course I'm loooking at a 2500 or 5000 MPC...
This plus my live keyboards (virus TI and an emu longboard) and the other band members live synths etc and we should be set.
This is the way I understand things get done because of when I started in this... if notes get played, not loops...
I remember the MPC-60 being the answer to a lot of peoples prayers when it was announced.... meaning you could take a great deal of your studio sound into the live environment, and quite robustly, because you could use drum samples (actual hits not other peoples loops) program your patterns with them and program your synth sequences to all your other gear through midi. And you had the faders (q-link now I think) and pads could repeat notes .... Also very cool because linn was a name with a lot of cache because of the Linn Drums Mk1 and 2.
Just to make it more accessible as a solution, for those of us who didn't need akai's sampling because we had emulators or alsready had S900's or S612's Akai made the asq-10 sequencer as an option which I always understood as the sequencing guts of the MPC. The idea being that we could still take our synths and sequence parts live and not use pc's or laptops.
This is the way I always viewed the MPC, but these days the MPC seems to be viewed very very differently.
I read on here people asking what's best for "laying down beats" , what's best "for drums". but "not sequencing"... What is "laying down beats" !!! Is this programming you kick , hihat, snare etc patterns.... Or is it using what we used to call 'loops' ..... What do these expressions mean?
It seems the mpc has grown from being a sampler and sequencer into something more like a DAW, especially now with this cd recording and even 8 track recording...... Which is cool....
But with this emphasis on chopping up sections of other peoples music and re-interpreting it in your own piece, the MPC seems to be more of a dance music or hip-hop production tool rather than a sequencer / sampler for musicians. Massively powerful etc.....
Or is it that now they are so powerful, comparatively to what was possible at the time the IDEA of an MPC was born, that they can be used in entirely different ways.
I'm wondering if I need a modern mpc at all.
Last edited by Bigmojo on Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.



