Talk and share knowledge on rare records, sources of new samples, vinyl, diggin, etc

By csmealer Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:32 am
Cool. That Sir Lord Baltimore album in particular sounds like it might be good.
I don't make enough to pay $50+ for one record, but I bet people will still shell out cash for the originals. A lot of original pressings of rare records that have been reissued on vinyl still go for pretty high prices.

By fobedafied Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:59 am
i-tunes and similair bullschit will never effect the value of my record collection... :wink: :roll:
User avatar

By Dr_Doom Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:45 pm
Yup Yup people will still be buying wax cos nothing sounds quiet like it. Places like that just mean more stuff to sample.
User avatar

By dj e.d.e Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:54 pm
more for the IRAA will be watching this even more IMHO.

digital and anolog is matter of choice here...i MUCH perffer ANOLOG.

a VIRTUAL file wont last for ever,a RECORD(vinyl) will.

i aint worried about it.

eventually digital diggers will pay what they didnt think they had to.
IRAA is gettin closer
User avatar

By DOVESKI Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:16 pm
all i know is im glad theyre doing this, the mp3s are at 320kbps to - and theyll sound better - remember the original recordings are still analog, you just losing the scrathcings and hiss of the vinyl which is better for sampling.
User avatar

By DOVESKI Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:16 pm
fobedafied wrote:i-tunes and similair bullschit will never effect the value of my record collection... :wink: :roll:


your so **** cool. :roll:
User avatar

By dj e.d.e Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:39 am
DOVESKI wrote:all i know is im glad they re doing this, the mp3s are at 320kbps to - and theyll sound better - remember the original recordings are still analog, you just losing the scrathcings and hiss of the vinyl which is better for sampling.
you lose frequency on it ,

AND once 320kbps
GOES out whats goin to happen to it then it will be come trash like every other MP3 before that one.

vinyl sounds GREAT. static ? what static ,i got records that are 50 yrs old or older ...that dont have static on them.

most time's if you hear static is because your needles thru or your not grounded properly. peoples hearing is being destroyed from digital hearing
thas just my opinion
Last edited by dj e.d.e on Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

By fobedafied Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:44 am
DOVESKI wrote:
fobedafied wrote:i-tunes and similair bullschit will never effect the value of my record collection... :wink: :roll:


your so **** cool. :roll:




thanks for the e-props homeslizzle... :twisted: but i could never be as cool as you mac hipsters with your 320kb, iraa sanctioned, propriertary formats... :wink: :twisted:


EVERYONE knows that vinyl has a much higher frequency response than any fukn bitrate EVER could... 8)
User avatar

By djobserv Sat Feb 02, 2008 3:32 am
not worth much to who?

the serato dudes who have no record collection, but 200gig's of music???

By Otayo20 Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:56 am
thats good shht but I dont think downloaded mp3's will make physical vinyl worth any less money. especially cause the folks who really listen and buy this music are collectors and mp3's have NO re sail value whats so ever.

too bad they aint got that pre listen shit like itunes does. ill be on that site all day..lol
User avatar

By crossings Sun Feb 03, 2008 4:04 am
this will not affect the rare vinyl market in the least. anyone who would rather have MP3s of the album [rather than the LP] would have never paid over $10 for the record anyway... 'cause they're cheap like that. just sayin. dudes who are out there scooping up rare LPs for $500 n such are not gonna stop and download it instead. they only **** with records.

matter of fact, in some cases an album getting repressed can bring more attention to the release and therefore raise the demand of the original LP format since more people will know of it's existence and know that it's a collector's item worth $$$... and this actually boosts the price even higher.

By fobedafied Sun Feb 03, 2008 4:49 am
crossings wrote:this will not affect the rare vinyl market in the least. anyone who would rather have MP3s of the album [rather than the LP] would have never paid over $10 for the record anyway... 'cause they're cheap like that. just sayin. dudes who are out there scooping up rare LPs for $500 n such are not gonna stop and download it instead.






a couple very good points you have there...





















...as to why im so fucn cool! :wink: :twisted: :lol: :lol: :lol:




:roll:

By GrantB Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:06 am
csmealer wrote: That Sir Lord Baltimore album in particular sounds like it might be good.


It's way good if you like rock. It's the only record I recognize off that list. I wouldn't call it "heavy metal" though.

PS haha @ vinyl haters. Have fun with that.