Can't decide which MPC to choose? Read these resources or post your questions here.

By klixxx Thu May 11, 2006 11:21 pm
thx for the update lol
but what is the difference between 0S2.1 and the older operational system of the 1k
i know we could make a whjole new thread out of this but fast fast
User avatar

By Mr modnaR Fri May 12, 2006 6:39 am
there are already several threads about the new os.
User avatar

By 3001 Fri May 12, 2006 5:01 pm
but not in comparison format
User avatar

By Jacpot Fri May 12, 2006 7:18 pm
I cant beleive all u pussies backing the 1k. Fuk dat lil shyt mang :lol:
User avatar

By Jacpot Sat May 13, 2006 1:45 am
Eddie Kain wrote:
Jacpot wrote:I cant beleive all u pussies backing the 1k. Fuk dat lil shyt mang :lol:



Image







and you made it to my sig NIIIIGAAAAAAA!!!!
:lol:
User avatar

By Cap_Ill Tue May 16, 2006 4:35 pm
OS 2.1 is dope. lots of convenient updates.
User avatar

By 3001 Tue May 16, 2006 6:05 pm
yea, 2kxl is the ghetto mpc. not as ghetto as the 2k....so ghetto:-)

By COOL G MONEY Tue May 23, 2006 6:42 pm
The 1K can do more...but the XL seems easier to me.

Sound
The sound on the 1000 is thinner to me than the XL. The highs seemed harsh and the low end just doesn't have as much punch as the XL. My ears, my opinion.

Effects
I don't have the effects card on my XL so I can't compare the effects.

Pads
We all know - XL is better. One thing people tend to forget when it comes to instruments (computer, guitar, or MPC) is that ergonomics is important. The XL has a surface area that is very ergonomic, the XL is less and computers...let's face it you're limited to a keyboard and mouse. People who say the prefer something to hit on versus using a mouse are really saying that ergonomics are important. This is probably one reason why Rolands MC909 and SP series samplers couldn't compete with Akai.

XL is for those producers who not what they're gonna do...
Good Low End Filter, Sequencer, Basic Sample Editing and Drum Production = XL

MPC 1000 is for those who aren't as sure but want all options available....
Experiementation, Effect, Vocal Sampling, Portability = 1K

By streetbeats Wed May 24, 2006 6:52 pm
COOL G MONEY wrote:The 1K can do more...but the XL seems easier to me.

Sound
The sound on the 1000 is thinner to me than the XL. The highs seemed harsh and the low end just doesn't have as much punch as the XL. My ears, my opinion.

Effects
I don't have the effects card on my XL so I can't compare the effects.

Pads
We all know - XL is better. One thing people tend to forget when it comes to instruments (computer, guitar, or MPC) is that ergonomics is important. The XL has a surface area that is very ergonomic, the XL is less and computers...let's face it you're limited to a keyboard and mouse. People who say the prefer something to hit on versus using a mouse are really saying that ergonomics are important. This is probably one reason why Rolands MC909 and SP series samplers couldn't compete with Akai.

XL is for those producers who not what they're gonna do...
Good Low End Filter, Sequencer, Basic Sample Editing and Drum Production = XL

MPC 1000 is for those who aren't as sure but want all options available....
Experiementation, Effect, Vocal Sampling, Portability = 1K



Probably the most well put opinion ive read so far. I agree the 2kxl is not a workstation it serves a certain need.........from what i understood mainly for drums!!
User avatar

By djobserv Wed May 24, 2006 9:52 pm
COOL G MONEY wrote:The 1K can do more...but the XL seems easier to me.

Sound
The sound on the 1000 is thinner to me than the XL. The highs seemed harsh and the low end just doesn't have as much punch as the XL. My ears, my opinion.

Effects
I don't have the effects card on my XL so I can't compare the effects.

Pads
We all know - XL is better. One thing people tend to forget when it comes to instruments (computer, guitar, or MPC) is that ergonomics is important. The XL has a surface area that is very ergonomic, the XL is less and computers...let's face it you're limited to a keyboard and mouse. People who say the prefer something to hit on versus using a mouse are really saying that ergonomics are important. This is probably one reason why Rolands MC909 and SP series samplers couldn't compete with Akai.

XL is for those producers who not what they're gonna do...
Good Low End Filter, Sequencer, Basic Sample Editing and Drum Production = XL

MPC 1000 is for those who aren't as sure but want all options available....
Experiementation, Effect, Vocal Sampling, Portability = 1K


the master eq works wonders ;)
User avatar

By 1st up Thu May 25, 2006 1:11 am
XL is for those producers who not what they're gonna do...
Good Low End Filter, Sequencer, Basic Sample Editing and Drum Production = XL

MPC 1000 is for those who aren't as sure but want all options available....
Experiementation, Effect, Vocal Sampling, Portability = 1K[/quote]




i could agree with that
User avatar

By Antonym Fri May 26, 2006 8:11 pm
Good Low End Filter, Sequencer, Basic Sample Editing and Drum Production = XL


i dont get it

why did you only attribute that to the xl1? the mpc1000 does all that...
User avatar

By d_loc Sun May 28, 2006 10:16 pm
Don't forget the tilt screen

I prefer the 2000xl screen over the 1k, text looks better to me
User avatar

By naVi Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:51 pm
aight yall, i juss copped a XL w/ card reader...

im comin from a MPC 1K...sure the new JJ 3.o OS is hella dope...but the XL just feels better to me..

The 1k is great, but it does sound thinner...the XL bangs like a mutha...PADS are what sold me...i was going to grab a 2500 along with the 1k but mahh, the new os gives me all that glitzz...

1 low pass filter...big whoop...all i used on the 1k was the low anyway...and is it just me or does the OS 2.10 for the MCD run faster than the original?