
I would say, if you use midi whatsoever in your production, the 60.
Workflow is much nicer on the 60... and since it has a much more robust sequencer, it is more valuable to me in the studio...
Screen size... big plus on the 60.
Chopping... it is sloppier on the 1200 to me... but that is a part of the "classic swing" of the machine.
Price... 60 wins again.
Looks? 1200, or 60II are both baller... gigantic, and comfortable to work on
Production... I HATE tapping out shit on SP's ... despise it actually.... its loud, un-sensitive, and cumbersome.. I hooked a Korg padkontrol to mine or an mp...
The 60 pads are sweet usually, but depends on the age and use of the pad sensor.
Sound.... well Apples and Oranges here.
60 sounds punchy in the lows...dusty and dark in the mids, with a little sizzle up top in the 15k range..
the 1200 sounds grindy and brilliant... with extended tight lows and deep kicks, snappy/ slappy mids, and a nice metallic tinge to anything above 10k.... especially when pitched down severely.
I love both.... but if you are looking to do work, and you only have the room for one right now, I would do a 60II with scsi and 3.1... and the sp later.
youd spend 1200us on a clean sp1200 reissue, and you are stuck at floppy disks...
or...
you spend 650us and get a 3.1, Marion SCSI, and expanded memory... and you are at zip disk already, and have 26.2 seconds of sampling... vs 10ish.
Which one is cooler? the 1200, no doubt... but, which one makes more sense if it is either or? hands down the 60.
I just sold my sp-12 turbo... and am planning on buying a 1200 in the near future, but kept my 60II's around cause of functionality.
poundaproblem wrote:"...dudes like me. Dudes who started YEARS ago and spent HOURS, DAYS, WEEKS, MONTHS, YEARS to learn our craft just so some little swaggot can buy an MPC, download a DAW and call himself a producer."