By aes-one
Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:22 am
i know this has been discussed before, but I am still debating this question and would like some more insight on the matter.
both machines seem to be able to do everything i want them to do, with the exception of the 808 lacking velocity sensitive pads and a couple of glitches/shortcomings, both of which i can get over however.
my main question is, how does the workflow process compare with these 2 machines?
i've owned a 2000xl before and liked it, so i know what the akai mpc's are all about. but I am very curious about roland's workflow. is it more intuitive, or easier and faster to get an idea out vs. the mpc's?
i know this is all relative and dependent on the person, but i want to hear YOUR experiences and YOUR opinions.
thank you!
both machines seem to be able to do everything i want them to do, with the exception of the 808 lacking velocity sensitive pads and a couple of glitches/shortcomings, both of which i can get over however.
my main question is, how does the workflow process compare with these 2 machines?
i've owned a 2000xl before and liked it, so i know what the akai mpc's are all about. but I am very curious about roland's workflow. is it more intuitive, or easier and faster to get an idea out vs. the mpc's?
i know this is all relative and dependent on the person, but i want to hear YOUR experiences and YOUR opinions.
thank you!



