Forum to discuss all matters relating to the MPC1000 and MPC2500 operating systems created by 'JJ' (all versions).
By phasebash Sun Aug 10, 2014 2:49 am
I recently acquired a MPC 2500 with license for JJOS 2XL with version 3.45 and I've spent the greater portion of last month toying around with it. After realizing it's lack of Velocity -> Sample Start, Attack, Decay, etc I went on a quest to find which JJOS versions supported it with help of this forum (thanks everyone).

Since, I've bounced around from JJOS 3, Free, 1, XL, and even the last Akai release. They are all great in their own way. This is the view of a newb, but it appears with each JJOS release, the author has been trying to optimize screen space (read: smaller everything and less window use), has generally degraded the grid view, generally improved the load/save screens, and added more macro-level features (batch edits, simults, etc).

FWIW, OS1 seems to fit my needs the best.

I'm just curious how the seasoned beat makers on this forum see it, and what you all use in your day to day and why. Thanks in advance.
User avatar
By bliprock Mon Aug 11, 2014 3:32 am
OS 3 all the way.
Chord bank mainly and its just works for me. I miss one thing from XL and that is some grid edit functions but that is fine I work around that very easily so no great loss.

Oh yeah and I need a lot of note memory and those two have the most
User avatar
By tsutek Tue Aug 12, 2014 11:25 am
Started with JJOS Free, then went JJOS1 and after a while ended up using OSXL.
At first I thought there were stuff missing from XL that I liked using in JJOS1, but I have since found the equivalent functions from XL (like qlink-to-swing - its under MAIN in JJOS1 but under GRID EDIT in OSXL). The MIDI remote control abilities in OSXL alone make it worth it for me!
By 1K Wrekcatch3r Mon May 04, 2015 9:53 pm
I feel that the amp envelope and filter controls are much tighter on JJOS1 then JJOS2, JJOS3 or XL. Does anybody else feel the same and if so have you figured out how to manipulate the same features on the latter versions to compensate or make them just as tight?
By stale bread Thu May 14, 2015 2:38 am
thank you for pointing out the chart, I guess I'm more in a way looking for real world opinions /summaries on which os people are gravitating towards and why. I know opinions are subjective but they still have value amongst like minded individuals?
So I'm wondering what kind of user leans towards what kind of os, are people who are heavy into sampling leaning towards one where as people heavy into sequencing outboard gear towards another etc...?
User avatar
By medearis Thu May 21, 2015 4:35 pm
Audio tracks FTW.
I take full advantage of them on JJOS1, even if my use is barbaric (use audio track to record a riff then take that riff and set it on a pad, trigger it on the one).