Forum to discuss all matters relating to the MPC1000 and MPC2500 operating systems created by 'JJ' (all versions).
By timboy Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:34 pm
Hi!
Maybe this is and old topic for you guys. I got mye Akai a week ago, and I have been struggeling to find out about the midi CC on this machine. But... can it be that the midi CC have slipped their (akai) minds? I really thought this was something all "new" stuff had. If I´m right, this mpc1k is worthless to me. UGH!

mpc1000 with jjOS2 (vs1.19)

Anyone with a helping hand?

Best
User avatar
By hiphoppa Sat Aug 30, 2008 11:26 pm
timboy wrote:Hi!
Maybe this is and old topic for you guys. I got mye Akai a week ago, and I have been struggeling to find out about the midi CC on this machine. But... can it be that the midi CC have slipped their (akai) minds? I really thought this was something all "new" stuff had. If I´m right, this mpc1k is worthless to me. UGH!

mpc1000 with jjOS2 (vs1.19)

Anyone with a helping hand?

Best



All right timdog,

Heres what you do.

If you have kids in the house, get them out NOW!!!!

Throw the machine in the basement to avoid hurting anyone.

Its a about to get crazy in your house.


Handle it with care cause it can blow ANY second.



This is not a warning, the revolution will not be televised because you have set the thing ticking!!!


Call the police and let them know.....


That you are an idiot.


Good luck and I hope you get out alive.


If not, see ya!





Next time, do some friggin research. No one will help with your issue because this can easily be found on the forums if you took the time to look.
By dtaa pla muk Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:24 am
he means controlled BY midi ccs, folks.

tim, as of now there are 2 parameters which can be controlled via MIDI CC - filter cutoff and resonance, via 71 and 74 respectively.

New
[MIDI IN]
MIDI CC Number02 or 74 ==> Filter Cutoff
MIDI CC Number71 ==> Filter resonance
(Only active track )
It is added to the value of a program.


we hope to see more CCs controlling active track parameters, including QLINK NOTE ON stuff.
By timboy Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:28 pm
thanks Nym
so I guess my resarch was right. hopefully there rain some new cc ontrolled stuff over the 1k soon.
Until then I´ll tweak my machinedrum.
By nanoloop Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:36 pm
i cant get the decay to alter in realtime using the q link on a recorded hihat track. i used this alot to gate hihats and stuff on my xl, cant get it functionin the same. any1 else????
By timboy Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:04 pm
Hm, to control ADSR would at least be a basic start. And if the LFO could be attached to the ADSR and the LFO´s could be controlled by midi I would jump around and clap all day. Very strange, thought this was pretty basic.
After what I read it seems like that is a big step for JJ to implement.
User avatar
By Bugfix Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:39 pm
nanoloop wrote:i cant get the decay to alter in realtime using the q link on a recorded hihat track. i used this alot to gate hihats and stuff on my xl, cant get it functionin the same. any1 else????


Once, I couldn't do that either so I used sample end instead of decay. But now.. when you said that I checked this and the reason is adsr, set all params to 0 for a full effect, add back to your taste. Sorry for offtopic.
By dtaa pla muk Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:47 pm
more midi cc control of MPC params should have been integrated from the beginning of the product line, but this was never a big thing. unfortunately. you may be more likely to see the addition of existing QREAL parameters. i also hope QLINK NOTE ON parameters will be qlink assignable. it is in the QLINK NOTE ON parameters catagory that the ADSR envelopes would be midi controlled since such items are NOTE ON in nature. as of now, ATTACK and DECAY are QLINK NOTE ON assignable - perhaps the others will be added as well. what a nice day that would be...
User avatar
By legs mechanical Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:33 pm
I'm bringing this topic back from the dead so sorry...

Any chance of the MPC1000 responding to sysex message going into it? I've got a BCr2000 and I've been experiementing with sending sysex from that and thought if this implementation existed it might be possible to tweak things externally with this.... if its possible... (i know the 4000 worked that way)