By dtaa pla muk
Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:37 am
please contact MPC-tutor if you think mods are behaving poorly in this subforum or others.
evil A Sulli wrote:sally wrote:
Ohh Sally, tell the MPC Forums how many times you have PMed me with nonsense.
crossings wrote:..that goes without saying... but someone needs to point out the obvious here.
Nym wrote:please contact MPC-tutor if you think mods are behaving poorly in this subforum or others.
le rat wrote:From what I heard the main problem with OS2XL is the lack of space for parameters in order to implement new features.In respect to the hardware yes. Most people never requested more polyphony because we know there is a limit.
le rat wrote:It seems that OS128XL is based on a simplified code.Good to hear that.
le rat wrote:I think it's probably a "chance" that OS3 is in development, last time I asked about it I was told that JJ was tired and was seeking new challenges.MPC forums have plenty of challenges for him.
le rat wrote:At the beginning OS2XL will probably be superior but it will be up to users to give feedback and ask for improvements.I hope this is true and if it is OS3 will no longer be equal to OS128XL.
le rat wrote:If you think OS3 is not for you, just pass and don't do the free upgrade. After all it's just an OS, music...etcJJ made it free for a reason and OS3 is not an upgrade from OS2XL.
sally wrote:
was necessary to say here and now this?
I see you,'re angry,
actually this is the reason for their great state of anger?
I'm sorry, next time will not happen again.
smile man!!
le rat wrote:From what I heard the main problem with OS2XL is the lack of space for parameters in order to implement new features.
It seems that OS128XL is based on a simplified code.
le rat wrote:From what I heard the main problem with OS2XL is the lack of space for parameters in order to implement new features.
It seems that OS128XL is based on a simplified code.
I think it's probably a "chance" that OS3 is in development...
labcoats wrote:The MPC5000 is a drunken sailor on a drumkit
labcoats wrote:The MPC5000 is a drunken sailor on a drumkit
kneebone77 wrote:^Precisely.
aflo wrote:Maze: On quick glance it looks like he removed NDC but in reality he's replaced it with a better NDC which uses non destructive slices that can slice across the entire sample independent of the other slices. Check it out!
kaydigi wrote:aflo wrote:Maze: On quick glance it looks like he removed NDC but in reality he's replaced it with a better NDC which uses non destructive slices that can slice across the entire sample independent of the other slices. Check it out!
http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/~mpc1000/128 ... st_end.htm
MaZe wrote:kaydigi wrote:aflo wrote:Maze: On quick glance it looks like he removed NDC but in reality he's replaced it with a better NDC which uses non destructive slices that can slice across the entire sample independent of the other slices. Check it out!
http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/~mpc1000/128 ... st_end.htm
YO!!!!! This is a dream come true. I have done a workaround just like this on the MPC 4000 before by copying the sample multiple times (the 4K has 512mb ram, only way this is possible) but this is amazing! I assume that this will be in OS3 and not just 128XL? I guess I'll look for it on the comp list. Thanks for the heads up!