By timmytoga
Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:50 pm
I seem to remember watching some JJOS videos on youtube in which the process of loading, saving, and browsing waveforms/ samples was much quicker than my 2500. The overall response and processing speed of the various operations within the OS seemed, in general, much faster than my 2500.
I'm using JJOSXL, and I'm pretty sure I have a 7200 RPM hard drive within my 2500.
I have yet to try reformatting it, but that may help. Also, I'm wondering if it's possible that my harddrive speed is only 5600 RPM. Another idea is to store samples in a CF card (if it is faster than the hard drive).
Does anyone have any insight into improving the speed of data transfer for my 2500? This really affects the workflow, as I spend more time waiting than I've seen is possible on the 2500. Any tips, ideas, or insight would be greatly appreciated.
I'm using JJOSXL, and I'm pretty sure I have a 7200 RPM hard drive within my 2500.
I have yet to try reformatting it, but that may help. Also, I'm wondering if it's possible that my harddrive speed is only 5600 RPM. Another idea is to store samples in a CF card (if it is faster than the hard drive).
Does anyone have any insight into improving the speed of data transfer for my 2500? This really affects the workflow, as I spend more time waiting than I've seen is possible on the 2500. Any tips, ideas, or insight would be greatly appreciated.






