MPC1000 OS V3.0 beta ?

I thought you still had the orginal 1.0 Akai OS.

You right Sander I ain't the one who asked first..
So what's the best timing Akai 2.1 or JJ 3.0x?
Anyone can tell?
Also conceirning the "saving" witch is more reliable?
These two are the most important to me.

Thanks for your enlightments

loozman wrote:You right Sander I ain't the one who asked first..
So what's the best timing Akai 2.1 or JJ 3.0x?
Anyone can tell?
Also conceirning the "saving" witch is more reliable?
These two are the most important to me.

Thanks for your enlightments

there seems to be slightly better timming and the saving seems way better to me , im still on beta 16 and have not once had a directory error and i overwrite the same files when i save entire memory, i have heard some still get directory error but i havent seen it in a while

Thanks Cyclops you finally convinced me I should try JJ's OS.
For now I didn't mind all the bells & whistles and wasn't keen on learning a new OS.

loozman wrote:Thanks Cyclops you finally convinced me I should try JJ's OS.
For now I didn't mind all the bells & whistles and wasn't keen on learning a new OS.

cool, also there is not much to learn it sort of seems to all fit in the right place,if you know you mpc then this is easy

just a little question about os 3.03.
I've never tried to track and sync on os 2.10 before
and on os 3.03 in addition to "12" and "34" (choice of individual outputs)
we can choose 1,2,3 or 4. Is that a new feature?
i watched sparq's video but didn't find.

le rat wrote:just a little question about os 3.03.
I've never tried to track and sync on os 2.10 before
and on os 3.03 in addition to "12" and "34" (choice of individual outputs)
we can choose 1,2,3 or 4. Is that a new feature?
i watched sparq's video but didn't find.

You don't need to choose between 1,2,3 or 4, when tracking out, even in the earliest OS. You can choose 12, then pan one pad hard left to come out of only 1, and another hard right to come out of only 2, and the same with 34, just choose the pair and pan each sound hard to one side to get it out of one output.

yeah you're right but it seems that if you choose 1,2,3 or 4 it is automatically hard-pan. (i'm not sure but can't check in the mpc now)

hy,

is there a way in os 3.04 to stop the directrecord with barlength?
to get an tight endpoint....

hope you understand me...

greetz...

defect wrote:hy,

is there a way in os 3.04 to stop the directrecord with barlength?
to get an tight endpoint....

hope you understand me...

greetz...

no, this bug isn't fix at the moment. i think (hope!) jj is still working on it.

Mu-Tron wrote:

le rat wrote:just a little question about os 3.03.
I've never tried to track and sync on os 2.10 before
and on os 3.03 in addition to "12" and "34" (choice of individual outputs)
we can choose 1,2,3 or 4. Is that a new feature?
i watched sparq's video but didn't find.

You don't need to choose between 1,2,3 or 4, when tracking out, even in the earliest OS. You can choose 12, then pan one pad hard left to come out of only 1, and another hard right to come out of only 2, and the same with 34, just choose the pair and pan each sound hard to one side to get it out of one output.

I HATED 12 34 and having to PAN hard in the earlier os.
now i LOVE the mode(a 11) screen with the WHOLE button and 1,2,3,4....
so nice ! but... if the Stereo outs could be switched to 5,6 that would be really cool

Version 3.05
Bug fixes:
-------------------------------------------------
[SAVE]
ENTIRE MEMORY & ALL PROGRAMS WITH SAMPLES
Saving to slowly than Ver2.1.

seems that JJ is busy with new os so bug report will reopen later

sorry i've been trying to follow the flow here but i'm a bit confused... is the os version with track mutes out yet? if not when is it expected?

OcolopuS wrote:sorry i've been trying to follow the flow here but i'm a bit confused... is the os version with track mutes out yet? if not when is it expected?

if you mean recordable track mutes, it's not anounced.