Forum to discuss all matters relating to the MPC1000 and MPC2500 operating systems created by 'JJ' (all versions).
User avatar
By le rat Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:52 am
Bug fixes: New OS Ver4.28 04-Jan-2007
--------------------------------------
[GRID]
  It will crash, if a sequence is changed.

Change:
The audio track changed into eight tracks.
Old:61-64 4tracks
New:57-64 8tracks

グリッドの画面でシーケンスを変更するとハングする
メイン画面で音が出なくなる

変更
オーディオトラックを4トラックから8トラックに変更しました。(57-64)
User avatar

By Rise of EPC Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:31 am
updates..inbetween updates... damn. :shock:
User avatar

By Antonym Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:46 am
Rise of EPC wrote:updates..inbetween updates... damn. :shock:


hahahahh
User avatar

By Tchenn Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:16 pm
Too fast for us... :lol:

By Putter Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:56 pm
Great isn't it! That was the bug I reported. They sent me an email stating that they would do an update with a fix for this before 4.30 & here it is.! :o

They are hustling on that end. This also makes me wonder, where are they going with this thing? How much more can they do? What does the machine have left in it before it starts to spit up (Breaks Down) on us. So far, everything that they have done has been very useful. If you are a midi guru, they have you covered now. The sample junkies are well taken care of with the newer OS.

I mean really, what is left? Yes they can make some functions a bit more easier to do & what have you. But I'm talking about new stuff. Any ideas??? Just a thought.

By Putter Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:58 pm
Well the timestretch algorithm is flawed but they even made a work-around for that.

I'm talking about the creature comfort type of stuff. I mean some really new & functional features.
User avatar

By Antonym Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:39 am
Well the timestretch algorithm is flawed but they even made a work-around for that.


could you explain both the flaw and the work around? i don't follow.

By Putter Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:58 am
From my experience, the 1k does not read the bpm correctly. Even in a 4 bar sample. Ie, flaw. The JJ OS work-around lets you put in the correct bpm. Go to Trim>Edit>Timestretch>F2-Tempo & there you will see the difference between JJ & Akai. Akai did not have a tempo detect manual option for tempo detect in the time stretch area like this.

Anyways, if you put your time sig in (Which I think is an error. It shows, in the manual mode 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, which are not time sigs but note values, you can get a decent timestretch. It works pretty good the manual way.

Either way, this is the work-around I'm refering to.
User avatar

By Antonym Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:03 am
oh i got you now.

By Dahkter Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:57 am
How about the click at the end of the sample in timestretch, wonder when that will get fixed...