By tomviolence
Fri Jun 22, 2007 2:11 pm
one of the things i always disliked about the mpc sequencer (as opposed to something like cubase or even the yamaha rm1x) was the inability to have sequences of different lengths superimposed on one another. i.e. 3 against 4, 7 against 8, or any other kind of rhythmic cross-cutting that is at the root of all african-derived music. not only does this technique create rhythmic complexity and tension, but it can also result in a "generative" music, as postulated by Brian Eno. you simply set up various loops of different lengths and the music composes itself.
anyway, the simultaneous sequence feature of the jj os solves all of this. by overlapping, say, sequences of 12 and 16 bar lengths you can create quite a lot of variation out of simple materials. this is the key to "minimal" music, and a way to make the listener a part of the process. i love that moment when i am hearing the accent of the beat one way, and then something flips in my brain and i'm hearing it another way. did the beat change, or is it just my imagination?
anyway, the simultaneous sequence feature of the jj os solves all of this. by overlapping, say, sequences of 12 and 16 bar lengths you can create quite a lot of variation out of simple materials. this is the key to "minimal" music, and a way to make the listener a part of the process. i love that moment when i am hearing the accent of the beat one way, and then something flips in my brain and i'm hearing it another way. did the beat change, or is it just my imagination?


