Forum to discuss all matters relating to the MPC1000 and MPC2500 operating systems created by 'JJ' (all versions).
User avatar
By formantuk Fri May 16, 2008 4:12 pm
hello,

doe's anyone have a conversion calculation, or chart for note duration in step edit.
any help would be appreciated.

i'm sure this topic must have been discussed before. if not i'll be surprised.

example:
I want to set the length of a note to 1bar long -
the number that represents the duration of the notes length is just a number.
to find the length out i've been recording a note for 1 bar and seeing what the number is.
but this is annoying and not 100% accurate.


why can't it be in bars and beats like the note position?

anyone else find this a problem... or is it just an mpc thing?

cheers

f
Last edited by formantuk on Fri May 16, 2008 10:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
By dtaa pla muk Fri May 16, 2008 6:50 pm
this was my 2nd question ever in the mpc forums

"what is the notation of duration in step edit"

duration = ticks
multiply by 96 til you get what you need

alternately, go into Midi Grid Edit, hit overdub, hit qlink1 AFTER, move to your note, make sure OVERDUB is still red, and then move your qlink1 slider to change the duration in a visually helpful way
User avatar
By formantuk Fri May 16, 2008 10:16 pm
Nym wrote:
alternately, go into Midi Grid Edit, hit overdub, hit qlink1 AFTER, move to your note, make sure OVERDUB is still red, and then move your qlink1 slider to change the duration in a visually helpful way


Hey thanks nym - knew it was simple - still would like to see beats - i'd like to just punch in say 8 bars etc..
do you think jj would consider the idea ? maybe if it were a switch able option in [options]
i'm so used to cubase logic etc, it's the way my brains wired, from years of these edit pages.

cheers

f
By dtaa pla muk Fri May 16, 2008 11:09 pm
to be honest, my wager is probably not - though i do agree it'd make it cleaner from a strict musical terminology perspective. that's yet another leg up that DAWs have on MPCs functionally speaking

you know what i'd say though, is you could always post up a piece of paper on one of your speakers/monitors with the tick correspondents to a number of measurements: bars, beats, bars+odd quarter notes, etc etc etc. use the numeric key to program in the ticks. pretty fast, not as nice as you'd like but heh it's the best i can recommend...

i've done that before (and subsequently lost em during moves, etc)

the midi grid edit technique is probably the fastest right now rather than just scrolling and scrolling knawmeen
User avatar
By formantuk Sat May 17, 2008 12:23 am
Nym wrote:to be honest, my wager is probably not - though i do agree it'd make it cleaner from a strict musical terminology perspective. that's yet another leg up that DAWs have on MPCs functionally speaking


like you say - my moneys on not, as well. if your reading this jj - please take note we would like to be proven wrong :)

Nym wrote:you know what i'd say though, is you could always post up a piece of paper on one of your speakers/monitors with the tick correspondents to a number of measurements: bars, beats, bars+odd quarter notes, etc etc etc. use the numeric key to program in the ticks. pretty fast, not as nice as you'd like but heh it's the best i can recommend...


yeah, i think i'll sit down and write it all out - an pin it up.

as always, thanks for the help nym
User avatar
By formantuk Mon May 19, 2008 9:17 am
hey beach_break thanks! - there's some great stuff on this calculator.
it's gonna make many things a lot easier.

thanks again :)
User avatar
By CommanderRobot Mon May 19, 2008 3:51 pm
12 - 32th
24 - 16th
48 - 8th
96 - 4th
192 - half a bar
384 - one bar
768 - two bars

72 - dotted 8th
144 - dotted 4th


triplets:
16 - trip 16th
32 - trip 8th
64 - trip 4th