By Cat3
Wed May 27, 2009 10:29 pm
hahahaha, I'm sorry, I threw a burning match in a pool of fuel!!! I understand you all have to protect the beloved mpc you paid for, but hey, if mpc is the best sampler on the earth, why just few sample libraries are made in mpc format? there are ten times more high quality libraries made in Reason's sampler format than in MPC's!!!
mpc is GREAT for laying down patterns quickly and has a WONDERFUL workflow and a UNIQUE groove, but is very limited if used in a studio environment. you always have to multitrack your patterns on your daw and then work on the audio files... this is ok for hiphop and other "block-made" genres (with separate intro, chorus, verse, bridge, etc) it's also ok in electronic genres to put toghether a loop to be recorded in audio and then edited in a daw (see richard devine etc) but what to do if the mpc is your main sequencer and you have to automate a parameter for 16 bars? and if you have to automate 10 parameters? c'mon! you all know that serious producers use the mpc's just to lay down patterns, not to arrange songs!!!!!
@ dreadnutz: I NEVER said that ableton live sounds better than the mpc!!! I said that the songs I made tracking in ableton my other hardware (synths, drum-machines) sound way better than the songs I made tracking in ableton my mpc.
going further: if you believe that minimal is easy and stupid, you are the one limited from stereotypes. listen to serious minimal techno artists like gaiser from minus records. do you think you would be able to recreate something similar with just your mpc (without sampling records)? in this kind of music mpc IS a limit.
anyway, don't get angry dude... I'm saying that mpc is not for ME. I'm happy if you all are happy with it. but don't say you can do everything with it. producing complete and saleable minimal, idm, house, electro, drum'n'bass tracks with just an mpc is simply impossible.
peace,
Cat3
mpc is GREAT for laying down patterns quickly and has a WONDERFUL workflow and a UNIQUE groove, but is very limited if used in a studio environment. you always have to multitrack your patterns on your daw and then work on the audio files... this is ok for hiphop and other "block-made" genres (with separate intro, chorus, verse, bridge, etc) it's also ok in electronic genres to put toghether a loop to be recorded in audio and then edited in a daw (see richard devine etc) but what to do if the mpc is your main sequencer and you have to automate a parameter for 16 bars? and if you have to automate 10 parameters? c'mon! you all know that serious producers use the mpc's just to lay down patterns, not to arrange songs!!!!!
@ dreadnutz: I NEVER said that ableton live sounds better than the mpc!!! I said that the songs I made tracking in ableton my other hardware (synths, drum-machines) sound way better than the songs I made tracking in ableton my mpc.
going further: if you believe that minimal is easy and stupid, you are the one limited from stereotypes. listen to serious minimal techno artists like gaiser from minus records. do you think you would be able to recreate something similar with just your mpc (without sampling records)? in this kind of music mpc IS a limit.
anyway, don't get angry dude... I'm saying that mpc is not for ME. I'm happy if you all are happy with it. but don't say you can do everything with it. producing complete and saleable minimal, idm, house, electro, drum'n'bass tracks with just an mpc is simply impossible.
peace,
Cat3


