MPC5000 reviews, bug reports and fellow user support on the most recent standalone, hardware MPC from Akai
User avatar
By Blue Haze Sat Mar 07, 2009 12:32 am
kb420ps wrote:
Blue Haze wrote:
Jah we just had a battle and the instruments I used were from keygroups.




I'd like to hear the beats. Where are the links to the beats that you guys used for the battle?


http://www.myspace.com/askiashaheed

http://www.soundclick.com/members/defau ... 0haze%20ii


http://mpc-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=32538


Go to call out thread in the your music section start from page 45 to the end for the judgment.

Thanks again to Jah for the encouragement. 8)
User avatar
By Blue Haze Sat Mar 07, 2009 12:45 am
kb420ps wrote:
Blue Haze wrote:
http://www.myspace.com/askiashaheed
http://www.soundclick.com/members/defau ... 0haze%20ii



It sounds like you quantize all of your music. Do you?

Not criticizing. Just curious.



Which one the myspace.com/askiashaheed track is Jah`s?

or soundclick.com is me Blue Haze.


I make House and swing the drums so yes the drums are quantized and hats and percussion are swung but the keys are live.
By kb420ps Sat Mar 07, 2009 12:48 am
Ok. I thought both of those were your beats. The one that sounds like The Legend of Zelda is actually shaheed's.


They both sound hard quantized, that's why I asked.
By kb420ps Sat Mar 07, 2009 12:55 am
We spoke in another thread about quantization and feel, and for some reason, I thought that your music would have a more human/less quantized feel to it.


The MPC 4000 and 5000 have a note resolution of 960 ppq, so I thought most users wouldn't need quantize, and that they programmed more like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCKC-JdD ... 1/lesson2/
User avatar
By Blue Haze Sat Mar 07, 2009 2:01 am
Nice opinion different understanding and different feeling depending on
the muse of the creator.


By the way I too enjoy Digga's videos for Hip Hop. But for house I watch
Sandy Rivera or Reel Soul Rodrigez.
By kb420ps Sat Mar 07, 2009 2:16 am
Blue Haze wrote:Nice opinion different understanding and different feeling depending on
the muse of the creator.




I have no idea what you mean at all.

Quantize is quantize. Unquantized is unquantized.

Quantized midi has no human feel at all.
User avatar
By Blue Haze Sat Mar 07, 2009 2:47 am
Two things a dj has to blend from track to track with the kicks on the one at least to mix with the next track all house dj's do this for an continuos mix.

In hip hop dj's cut cuz the drums are live and syncopated. House the emphasis is baseline and keys but the pulse is constant kick and swinging hats along with live percussion. 960 ppq is great for keys to keep your feel intact for your head.

I make hip hop click on the demo beats ha ha.

And no swing doesn't mean striaght quantize.


Sorry not all music is hip hop? Let's listen to your tracks on your swing vs an mpc's swing?

.
User avatar
By Blue Haze Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:30 am
kb420ps wrote:We spoke in another thread about quantization and feel, and for some reason, I thought that your music would have a more human/less quantized feel to it.


The MPC 4000 and 5000 have a note resolution of 960 ppq, so I thought most users wouldn't need quantize, and that they programmed more like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCKC-JdD ... 1/lesson2/




You might have miss this as alot of producers do this go back and watch
Digga quantize the snare using 1/16th and more than likely plays like many
others (I included) the kicks and hats on the 4k off/96th not 960 to keep close
to a 3k or 2xl 96ppq feel. Or keep it simple and just shift your snares and hats and swing the kicks old school premo, rock boom bap.

It is your muze.
By kb420ps Sat Mar 07, 2009 3:22 pm
I didn't miss anything. I have been programming beats since 86. I know all about what he did and didn't quantize. I just used his video as an example of something that we discussed in another thread. In another thread you said that you couldn't use Live to sequence in because it didn't have the same feel as your MPC, yet the music I heard in your "beat battle" was house music which is all pretty much hard quantized and doesn't require any human "feel" at all. Most of the people who use Live are actually doing more of your type of music than Hip Hop (at least it seems that way on their forums).

My issue isn't with what or how Digga did what he did. It's more about what you consider to be "feel" in a MPC vs software in a situation where you are quantizing everything anyway.


Here is a quote from you on the other thread:

Blue Haze wrote:Thanks I already have. I use ableton for my remixes with aceppellas and such. For me midi sequencing rhythm tracks and sample based tracks on a mpc is different but I not going to debate all of that cuz we both would be here all night.

Click on my sign to hear the beats and tracks I make if you want understand that the feel and groove I work for.




After listening to your "beats and tracks", I just don't see what's different about the "feel and groove" that would make one choose the MPC's sequencer over Live's.

Now if you said that you couldn't get that "human feel" that Digga is talking about in his video through actually tapping the beat (kicks and hats in his video specifically) in with the quantize off, then I would agree that the MPC is superior with it's 960 ppq and absolute zero latency.

But if you are hard quantizing everything like in your music, there is no difference.

Anything that is hard quantized really doesn't have any "human" feel, because human drummers aren't computers.

So, once again, I ask you, what do you define as "feel and groove"?


I don't do house music. I mainly compose Hip Hop and RnB, but here are a few tracks done by another Live user (Rave) that are closer to House Music than anything that I would ever do. They were all done in the Live 8 Beta. Here is the link:

http://www.vimeo.com/3307887
http://www.vimeo.com/2943322

These tracks are hard quantized.

When it comes to house music, are his tracks lacking the "feel" of an MPC?
By b-righteous Sat Mar 07, 2009 4:25 pm
When it comes to house music, are his tracks lacking the "feel" of an MPC?


I don't do house but definitively yes. Not all MPCs are the same in this regard. I always thought the 4k was stiff when quantizing. Even on a 60, you don't want to quantize everything. It sounds better but you still want to leave quantize off on some parts.
User avatar
By Blue Haze Sat Mar 07, 2009 5:41 pm
kb420ps wrote:I didn't miss anything. I have been programming beats since 8


Cool then lets hear your beats enough talk.

I know all about what he did and didn't quantize.


Then why did you post up a hip hop video to compare to a house tracks claiming no quantize with quantization in the track??



I just used his video as an example of something that we discussed in another thread.


What has live and mpc got to do with this battle it is based on music not quantization or not. By the way the same tracks play in the Club Yellow before closing and the dancers and djs like them how about yours??? Who cares what you like??



In another thread you said that you couldn't use Live to sequence in because it didn't have the same feel as your MPC, yet the music I heard in your "beat battle" was house music which is all pretty much hard quantized and doesn't require any human "feel" at all.


You got issues so what if you can`t tell swing from hard quantize who cares its your problem. You should post an track of yours if you are all that.

Most of the people who use Live are actually doing more of your type of music than Hip Hop (at least it seems that way on their forums).


Most people use live to djs. I even made a hip hop mixtape with live it`s my prerogative nobodies going to tell me how to make my music. Do you and get over it. Music is music no matter what you use. I use a mpc for sequencing eat me.

My issue isn't with what or how Digga did what he did. It's more about what you consider to be "feel" in a MPC vs software in a situation where you are quantizing everything anyway.


You got issues seek help it is no biggy. Live 8 beta even includes mpc swing grooves cuz mpc swing is KING. But whether you know it or not you have to quantizae first to set the swing. After you swing, shift the timing you are no longer hard quantized. Ehh what the hell post up a track and show use what you got.

Here is a quote from you on the other thread:

Blue Haze wrote:Thanks I already have. I use ableton for my remixes with aceppellas and such. For me midi sequencing rhythm tracks and sample based tracks on a mpc is different but I not going to debate all of that cuz we both would be here all night.

Click on my sign to hear the beats and tracks I make if you want understand that the feel and groove I work for.




After listening to your "beats and tracks", I just don't see what's different about the "feel and groove" that would make one choose the MPC's sequencer over Live's.

Now if you said that you couldn't get that "human feel" that Digga is talking about in his video through actually tapping the beat (kicks and hats in his video specifically) in with the quantize off, then I would agree that the MPC is superior with it's 960 ppq and absolute zero latency.

But if you are hard quantizing everything like in your music, there is no difference.


I`m doing no such thing. Let`s hear yours.


Anything that is hard quantized really doesn't have any "human" feel, because human drummers aren't computers.

So, once again, I ask you, what do you define as "feel and groove"?


Groove is what moves the floor.

I don't do house music. I mainly compose Hip Hop and RnB, but here are a few tracks done by another Live user (Rave) that are closer to House Music than anything that I would ever do. They were all done in the Live 8 Beta. Here is the link:



Why be a baby and post someone`s else`s work rather than yours?? If live is your main sequencer show it without all
this hard quantization nonsense you blowing up and let the people on the call out thread decide.
http://www.vimeo.com/3307887
http://www.vimeo.com/2943322

These tracks are hard quantized.

When it comes to house music, are his tracks lacking the "feel" of an MPC?
User avatar
By Blue Haze Sat Mar 07, 2009 5:44 pm
This is house.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... ndy+Rivera

This is house

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QD_XaPIeum8

Dude you don`t really know what you are talking about.


This guy is really fun on put it down on an mpc making house.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoOeP8eG ... re=related

A simple demonstration from the same guys programming and swinging on the mpc.

A little known fact on the forum it that house and hip hop started around the same time and by djs making up their own
grooves using the same gear for their sets. The core of what we do is to provide the rhythm tracks for the jams that have to blend with the other mixes in the set. Simple swing the hats and percussion one dimensional individual.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gt8xB-Pq_0c











In the end it doesn`t matter what you use I use a mpc. What matters is the dance floor grooves to your music.

Good night.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gt8xB-Pq_0c
By kb420ps Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:42 pm
You know what, you win.

I'm not gonna pursue this any further. I didn't mean to upset you.

I really didn't understand something you said in another thread, and I understand even less now than I did before because I guess you took something personally.

If you took something that I said personally I apologize.


I meant you no harm.

It is what it is.


Chill out man!

Watch a video and relax:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oe7OfyHp ... re=channel