at the end of the day though... who really cares?
plenty of people care. it is important, especially when people are spending money based on this advice. more on this in my last paragraph.
and plenty of people have done scientific tests to determine that the difference that people here in DAWs is illusion.
please remember:
this is not a criticism of your hearing or your perception, AT ALL, so i want to express that i TRULY want to avoid this turning into a personal argument. we are all equally gullible when it comes to hearing different things based on context, etc. the classic audio engineer example is listening to a track, deciding it needs some EQ, adjusting some EQ properties, and then feeling good about the difference in sound -- only to realize that the EQ was bypassed/disabled/etc.
now, different models of MPCs...nobody's done a null test on those yet. i believe that there would be a difference, proving that they do indeed sound different. DAWs, on the other hand, have been extensively researched, as this argument comes up a LOT as people try to make informed decisions on which DAW to purchase.
googling this issue brings up a billion threads, most of which seemingly go unresolved. however, the way it usually ends up is this:
side A: 1-1 = 0. using the null test, we have shown that rendered wavs from DAWs (using the same pan laws/gain structures etc) null (ie cancel out when one wav is inverted and played against the other) to 0 or less than -80 or so db.
side B: 1-1 = magic. i still hear a difference.
i cannot help but go with the math/physics on this one. if i were to trust my life to one of those two options, i would go with A every time.
-------------------
now, science aside. IF YOUR USE OF A PROGRAM ALLOWS YOU TO MAKE MUSIC THAT SOUNDS BETTER, DUE TO YOUR TALENT/ABILITY TO WORK THE PROGRAM, then that program is a better choice for you. hands down. you will sound better using that program than any other option. USE it and love it. this is where the "let's just make music" part comes in and in the end, it is the most important.
but to purchase a DAW based on perceived sound quality DESPITE the evidence against such is potentially
a thousand dollar mistake... not a big deal to those with huge budgets, maybe, but to 99.9% of the people reading this forum, that is a LOT of money to spend on hocus pocus. i think that is easy enough to agree on.
and just to reiterate, i have absolutely no judgement on the people here who use or recommend Protools at all.
if i can be shown that there is a difference and that all the tests thus far are wrong, i will happily eat my words on this issue. however,
digital audio is relatively easy to test against itself. it's hard to attribute this issue to mystery, unlike subtle differences between 808s due to the tolerance of different electrical components, etc...