Bug reports & end-user support for Akai's MPC Software 'controllers' including the new MPC Studio 2, the MPC Touch, MPC Renaissance & original MPC Studio and MPC StudioB lack.
User avatar
By ArKyve-31 Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:16 pm
carloboranga wrote:
With all the inputs and screen it has to be standalone


i think it has imputs because it's a controller + audio interface...

about the screen must say every controller has one... this is a real big one because they recycled other mpc screens or something



Read the specs, its stand alone
User avatar
By SimonInAustralia Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:18 pm
MPC-Tutor wrote:
cyrus wrote: if all akai did was make a virtual copy of itself, I do not think that is enough, entering the realm of software there are somethings that simpley dont translate the same, even if you try to mimic the workflow, it just wont work, you have to adapt.


Completely agree - just copying the MPC will not work at all, it has to evolve and integrate into the computer environment, hopefully with some innovative features thrown in. I'm hoping they had some real intelligent, forward thinking, actual working producers involved in the development of this product to ensure that people were thinking outside of the box when coming up with the spec, while also appreciating the actual needs of a working producer.

Not sure it will be much more than moving the MPC sofware out of the MPC and into the computer in terms of features, other than maybe the VST plugins.
User avatar
By SimonInAustralia Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:19 pm
ArKyve-31 wrote:
carloboranga wrote:
With all the inputs and screen it has to be standalone


i think it has imputs because it's a controller + audio interface...

about the screen must say every controller has one... this is a real big one because they recycled other mpc screens or something



Read the specs, its stand alone

Don't think so, it is a computer control surface, with built in audio and MIDI interfaces, the MPC software runs on the computer, so can't run standalone.

Can you quote the specs that say it operates standalone?
User avatar
By JamesJeffery Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:20 pm
SimonInAustralia wrote:
JamesJeffery wrote:But, if the Akai DAW does not support VSTs, then using a VST with the Ren. such as Kontakt or Battery will make for an expensive controller depending on the price of the Ren. All for the sake of having an MPC look a like. Because if you're using the Ren. to control VSTs and not the Akai DAW all it is, is a controller and you lose the benefit of it's intended purpose.

Wait until you use it before talking definitively about what it can and can't do, and what it is and isn't like to use.

It is an MPC, not an MPC look alike, while using the knobs to control VST plugins the rest of it still will work exactly like the control surface on every older MPC, it isn't one or the other.

It isn't going to need Kontact or Battery, it is still going to operate like an MPC without requiring the purchase of drum sampling/machine VST plugins.

Every other MPC has a control surface, a sequencer, a sampler, effects, etc., this is just running the sequencer/sampler/effects on the external computer instead of the internal computer.

Have a good look at it, it still has the same MPC control surface, with the same sort of controls on it, it still has the MPC LCD display, these are what you interact with on an older MPC, why do you think this is going to be so different in actual music making use?

The video shows with VMPC software, it doesn't look like there is much interaction that you have to do with the computer screen when actually using the MPC. It does look like a lot of the file management tasks would be a lot easier on the computer, file storage/editing/program setup/etc.

There is no reason why actually using it will be that much different to using an older MPC.

It is much, much more than just a normal MIDI controller like an MPD.

I don't understand the hysterical level of hate on the thing.


But this is what you and others are not understand. Let me break it down a little. Please not I am not hating, I really hope this is a success, but so many people are just misinformed.Stuff like ...

[*] "Can't wait for JJOS"
[*] "It's standalone"
[*] "I'm selling my MPC for this"
[*] "It's not a controller"

Is all totally wrong which just goes to show how misinformed people are.

At it's base the actual device you touch, the Ren itself is a lump of plastic with knobs and buttons. Inside is an audio interface. Similar to the one you use in your current setup. It just has no casing and is screwed into the Ren.

When audio passes into the Ren. people may be tricked into believing the Ren. has a brain that is doing all of the wonderful magic. It's not. But this is what Akai want you to think, that's why they placed the audio interface inside it. Without it, it would just have a USB connector like the MPD and you'd use your regular audio interface.

The USB connection is responsible for transmitting midi data from the buttons you press. Midi goes in. Midi goes out. And at the base of it, that's the only thing the Ren actually does.

With the audio interface inside, people are led to believe that the Ren. has a brain.

The heart or the core of the Ren. is the piece of software you use. The Akai DAW. This is similar to JJOS/AkaiOS on the MPC's. Without the software, it's nothing but a box.

When hooked up to the Akai DAW the features implemented in the DAW make the Ren. box feel like an MPC. The midi data sent from bottons and pads on the Ren. box is pre programmed in the DAW to perform certain actions.

So without the Akai DAW when you press a button all you are sending is a midi message to a VST you are using. Which you can programme to do a certain task in any DAW of your choice.

This is all basic knowledge. But people are getting caught in the marketing hype of it all. At its heart it is just a controller. It's the Akai DAW that makes it powerful.

But, Akai need to make sure their DAW has features stuff like Kontakt don't. And other VST's and they need to make it behave as if the user feels like they are using and MPC and not a regular controller.

So, as you can see with questions like "Can I get JJOS" you see why the answer is a resounding NO. There is no heart/brain in the Ren. The only thing the Ren. is set to do is receive and send midi data and update it's display. The date you see on the screen would be controlled by the software not an internal OS like on true MPCs.

I think I've cleared the basics there. And once you understand that, you realize the only powerful thing that exists about the Ren. would be the Akai DAW.

Sorry this wasn't aimed at the person I quoted, but more in general for people who ask the same questions.
User avatar
By SimonInAustralia Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:36 pm
JamesJeffery wrote:But this is what you and others are not understand. Let me break it down a little. Please not I am not hating, I really hope this is a success, but so many people are just misinformed.Stuff like ...

[*] "Can't wait for JJOS"
[*] "It's standalone"
[*] "I'm selling my MPC for this"
[*] "It's not a controller"

Is all totally wrong which just goes to show how misinformed people are.

No, I do not think any of that, I know what it is.


JamesJeffery wrote:With the audio interface inside, people are led to believe that the Ren. has a brain.

No, I am not led to believe that at all.


JamesJeffery wrote:The heart or the core of the Ren. is the piece of software you use. The Akai DAW. This is similar to JJOS/AkaiOS on the MPC's. Without the software, it's nothing but a box.

Yes, the MPC control surface with the MPC software combined makes it an MPC, exactly like it does with an older standalone MPC.



JamesJeffery wrote:When hooked up to the Akai DAW the features implemented in the DAW make the Ren. box feel like an MPC. The midi data sent from bottons and pads on the Ren. box is pre programmed in the DAW to perform certain actions.

So without the Akai DAW when you press a button all you are sending is a midi message to a VST you are using. Which you can programme to do a certain task in any DAW of your choice.

That may be a bonus function of the MPC plugin to use within other DAWs, but that is not what this is about at all.

This is an MPC, just with the MPC software running on an external computer rather than an internal computer.

It is just as much an MPC as any other MPC.


JamesJeffery wrote:This is all basic knowledge. But people are getting caught in the marketing hype of it all. At its heart it is just a controller. It's the Akai DAW that makes it powerful.

I'm not getting caught in any marketing hype.

It is the integration of the dedicated control surface with the MPC software that makes it powerful, exactly like an older MPC.

An older MPC is a similar control surface, running similar software, but on an internal computer.


JamesJeffery wrote:I think I've cleared the basics there. And once you understand that, you realize the only powerful thing that exists about the Ren. would be the Akai DAW.

No, sorry, you are just talking shit.

What you don't understand is that the integration of dedicated control surface and the MPC software in this new MPC is pretty much the same as an older MPC.


I don't know why I bother arguing it with you, keep on hating, maybe get an idea first.
User avatar
By scoobylol Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:46 pm
SimonInAustralia wrote:
What you don't understand is that the integration of dedicated control surface and the MPC software in this new MPC is pretty much the same as an older MPC.



Well when you break it down like that what integration is this really offering then?

An older MPC has MIDI, and a USB connection for certain tasks.

This new thing has MIDI and a USB connection for certain tasks.

We're yet to confirm whether standalone refers to the new virtual MPC software in a computer domain, or in fact if this can work truly standalone as a piece of dedicated outboard gear. Of course it will accomplish things more seamlessly via it's USB connectivity, but I'm still waiting to understand what this could actually offer that a Nanopad or any other MIDI controller and a bitcrusher in Ableton couldn't achieve comfortably. Or even my 1000 for that matter.
User avatar
By JamesJeffery Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:49 pm
SimonInAustralia wrote:
JamesJeffery wrote:But this is what you and others are not understand. Let me break it down a little. Please not I am not hating, I really hope this is a success, but so many people are just misinformed.Stuff like ...

[*] "Can't wait for JJOS"
[*] "It's standalone"
[*] "I'm selling my MPC for this"
[*] "It's not a controller"

Is all totally wrong which just goes to show how misinformed people are.

No, I do not think any of that, I know what it is.


JamesJeffery wrote:With the audio interface inside, people are led to believe that the Ren. has a brain.

No, I am not led to believe that at all.


JamesJeffery wrote:The heart or the core of the Ren. is the piece of software you use. The Akai DAW. This is similar to JJOS/AkaiOS on the MPC's. Without the software, it's nothing but a box.

Yes, the MPC control surface with the MPC software combined makes it an MPC, exactly like it does with an older standalone MPC.



JamesJeffery wrote:When hooked up to the Akai DAW the features implemented in the DAW make the Ren. box feel like an MPC. The midi data sent from bottons and pads on the Ren. box is pre programmed in the DAW to perform certain actions.

So without the Akai DAW when you press a button all you are sending is a midi message to a VST you are using. Which you can programme to do a certain task in any DAW of your choice.

That may be a bonus function of the MPC plugin to use within other DAWs, but that is not what this is about at all.

This is an MPC, just with the MPC software running on an external computer rather than an internal computer.

It is just as much an MPC as any other MPC.


JamesJeffery wrote:This is all basic knowledge. But people are getting caught in the marketing hype of it all. At its heart it is just a controller. It's the Akai DAW that makes it powerful.

I'm not getting caught in any marketing hype.

It is the integration of the dedicated control surface with the MPC software that makes it powerful, exactly like an older MPC.

An older MPC is a similar control surface, running similar software, but on an internal computer.


JamesJeffery wrote:I think I've cleared the basics there. And once you understand that, you realize the only powerful thing that exists about the Ren. would be the Akai DAW.

No, sorry, you are just talking ****.

What you don't understand is that the integration of dedicated control surface and the MPC software in this new MPC is pretty much the same as an older MPC.


I don't know why I bother arguing it with you, keep on hating, maybe get an idea first.


Dude, are you attempting to say the above is incorrect?! Even more stupid than I originally thought.

You're arguing because you're hoping Akai have created the super MPC that's going to kill all MPCs and you want to be first in line.

Good luck with that. Wishing you success and all that. I'll leave you to discuss in peace whilst I wait for my Tempest to arrive.
User avatar
By SimonInAustralia Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:51 pm
So will the next announcements be for a cut down controller...
MPC STUDIO
MUSIC PRODUCTION CONTROLLER
Slimline


...and iPad controller software...
MPC FLY
MUSIC PRODUCTION CONTROLLER
For iPad 2


...both controllers, like the MPC Renaissance, for the same MPC Software?

Maybe the MPC Studio is a smaller control surface, without audio and MIDI interfaces?
User avatar
By MPCWeapon1 Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:55 pm
This is sweet. Since it doesn't have an internal CPU that should knock 1000 dollars off the price.

Just wish they would have teamed up with Apogee and Apple with this, and released this as part of Logic 10...That would have been next level, and a game changer.

If this is cross platform friendly and the price is around 1000 dollars, I would be very interested. My MPC has been basically a midi controller for Logic these days anyway. This is coming out at the right time.
User avatar
By SimonInAustralia Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:58 pm
JamesJeffery wrote:Dude, are you attempting to say the above is incorrect?! Even more stupid than I originally thought.

You are seriously just as stupid as I originally thought.


JamesJeffery wrote:You're arguing because you're hoping Akai have created the super MPC that's going to kill all MPCs and you want to be first in line.

No, not at all, I don't think I will buy one at all. Maybe when the hype is well over and people are selling them second hand.

I don't think this is the super MPC, just an MPC with the software running on an external computer instead of inside the box.

See, you think you know everything, what everyone else is thinking, you have no idea.


I am arguing because you are talking massive amounts of shit about a product you have never seen or used in person.


JamesJeffery wrote:Good luck with that. Wishing you success and all that. I'll leave you to discuss in peace whilst I wait for my Tempest to arrive.

Care?

What has that got to do with this MPC, does owning a Tempest make you a better person than someone discussing, or thinking about buying, a new MPC?

Tempest is gay anyway, I'd wait for the Linndrum.
Last edited by SimonInAustralia on Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
By MPCRENAISSANCE Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:08 pm
This is a product of the Future which is where all producers have moved too!! It's simple.....

Producers want speed,features,work-flow,effects,integration etc which is what the Renaissance offers.
90% of real MPC users that make music and hits have wanted a product like this for so long and now it's here.

You will never please the older generation of beat makers. The new generation of beat makers that change the music we play are DAW users 100%

The Audio signal i imagine is to do with the classic 60/3000 feature.
User avatar
By SimonInAustralia Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:09 pm
scoobylol wrote:An older MPC has MIDI, and a USB connection for certain tasks.

This new thing has MIDI and a USB connection for certain tasks.

Think of it as the same as an old MPC, but the MPC operating system is running on your desktop/laptop computer instead of a computer inside the MPC itself.

I don't see that it is anything much more than that.


scoobylol wrote:We're yet to confirm whether standalone refers to the new virtual MPC software in a computer domain, or in fact if this can work truly standalone as a piece of dedicated outboard gear. Of course it will accomplish things more seamlessly via it's USB connectivity, but I'm still waiting to understand what this could actually offer that a Nanopad or any other MIDI controller and a bitcrusher in Ableton couldn't achieve comfortably. Or even my 1000 for that matter.

I think you will find that it is just a control surface/MIDI-audio interface, I don't think it is going to operate standalone.

It is not seamless due to USB connectivity, it is seamless because the MPC software is running in the computer.

What can your MPC1000 offer that a Nanopad or any other MIDI controller and a bitcrusher in Abelton couldn't achieve comfortably? A dedicated control surface/screen/sequencer/sampler? Isn't that what this new MPC gives you?


To me, it seems that is is just taking the MPC software out of the box, and running it on your computer.

This gives much better file integration with your Mac/PC, and allows VST plugs to run in the MPC software, I don't see much more than that.
Last edited by SimonInAustralia on Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By JAH Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:11 pm
I have to agree. Tempest is gay. Linndrum with sampling will make me sit up and take notice. Not a Tempest unless it cost under $1300.