Hardware differences...

Besides a few cosmetic differences built in interface and buttons what's the main differences in y'alls opinions that make one better than the next they all use same software I just want to see everyone's views.... I personally have the Mpc studio would like the Ren just bc it looks like the 2500 in a way the touch is cool bc it's new.... What's y'alls thoughts

The Ren is my pick...

It has the most tactile feel out of the most...
The most dedicated controllers(knobs and buttons) for specific things.
the most flexible inputs... (Easy just to plug in turntable straight in, mic , guitar etc)

dazastah wrote:The Ren is my pick...

It has the most tactile feel out of the most...
The most dedicated controllers(knobs and buttons) for specific things.
the most flexible inputs... (Easy just to plug in turntable straight in, mic , guitar etc)

Yea it appears to have the most control over all of em my opinion so far...

I tend to think the Touch has the most tactile control. The screen is assigned to much more. You dont have to look at the computer screen if you like. Not to mention xy effects. The workflow is faster with the screen.

I view the MPC controllers as a portable. Im not going to lug around a turntable with it.

what cosmetic differences did you mean physical ?

ren is like hardware mp

if you think touch is cool because it's new then you have issues

konc3pt wrote:what cosmetic differences did you mean physical ?

ren is like hardware mp

if you think touch is cool because it's new then you have issues

Lmao naw I mean like its the newer and has the touch screen and newer features, new never makes anything kool it's just more up to date... Like I said the Ren in my opinion is the overall better choice more 2500 looking and I'm all about the ol school look

all good...i hear touch's pads are better than ren's though...hopefully next iteration of ren will have them and the color screen