Share your knowledge on these two classic MPCs
User avatar

By Lo Pass Filter Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:44 pm
More sample time, 3.5" drive (which really makes a huge difference), reverse function, dynamic allocation to select pads, global decay to individual sounds verses all sounds in memory, midi sample dump.. these are just a few reason I can think of that would constitute spending the extra duckets for a 1200, instead of a 12 Turbo. I worked on both for years, definately like the 1200 more. 8)

By The Beat Conductor Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:09 pm
elmacaco wrote:the


1200


has


no


internal


sounds.



Do you mean factory disks?


Sorry, their not internal factory sounds...
their just random drum sounds loaded into the 1200... 8)
User avatar

By drumat!c Wed Jul 06, 2005 6:11 am
Saving sequences to a sp12 turbo is one thing but saving sounds to a commodore takes up to 15 minutes.....depending if you've come close to maxing out your sample capacity and who the fuk has time for that sh!t while you're in the heat of production? Gimme a sp1200 anyday.....

By I.Q. Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:23 am
elmacaco wrote:
The Beat Conductor wrote:Here are the internal sounds of the SP-1200...

SP-1200 Internal Sounds


I.Q????

He said does anyone know where he can find the internal sounds from the 12, not 1200. I'm pretty sure he knew the SP-1200 had no internal sounds.

By elmacaco Wed Jul 06, 2005 3:52 pm
Can you see the quote above? He corrected himself, why can't you?
User avatar

By MarkWolbirgh Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:43 pm
The little **** is only 15 years old.I find it ironic he calls himself "I.Q." :lol: .