The MPC 3000 actually has a S3000 sound engine!!!

Lampdog wrote:

Roopesh wrote:To be honest, i don't really care how bad i make my self look And at times you do it SO well. this is a virtual forum, not the houses of parliament.

my argument about software plugins was founded after MPC 3000's childish comments on how better (than an mpc) he can change a sample with a S2000.

but my original topic was Not, and had nothing to do with debates, open opinions, etc, etc. Wake up, you posted it on a what.... FORUM.... therefore in all actuality - it's open right from jump street. If you didn't want anyone to answer or state their opinions which you obviously didn't want then don't post. If you DO post then it's open season for ANY and ALL to opine on.fair game to anyoneit was a closed statement a "closed statement" posted on an open forum hmmm, impossible. for people who are unaware of what is inside the mpc3000, for newbies, mpc1000/2000(XL) users who could not afford an mpc 3000 (nor find one in the market), but wanted its sound.

thats all.

now if i made myself look stupid I said bad not stupid by replying back to uneccessary idiotic replies on a thread that i originally started, then i must say you as a moderator Lampdog aint doing ure Job as u should do.

my suggestion to you Lampdog is to read others posts and then make your final arguments I did just that, as apposed to biased replies based around protecting your freindship(s) with others. That's your opinion and that's cool, it's not true, even though I will not stoop to your level and say it's IDIOTIC for you to say so. WHAT a show of maturity, good on you.

I was stating the obvious, the reality of it showed that you couldn't mentally and maturely handle differing/opposing views that were thrown your way, SO, you chose to digress into something you THINK you know more of and about. That's real.

Aren't you the same guy who couldn't figure out "how to move a tick" or something to that effect? Tell me, why should I take to heart and mind your filth flarn filth about the sampling engine on the mpc3000?

And you think I'm not supposed to reply or speak up or something and remain in the background? I'm STILL a member JUST like everyone here Oh yeah, exactly what is my job? Don't get upset with me dude, I did nothing to you. So what, exactly is my job?

jigginz wrote:Quote Roopesh:

"why do you reply to my posts when you know that you have very little chances of always winning."

Nice!
A real depth of character with a real positive attitude towards this forum.

I say just let him win coz that's what he likes!
Mind you, that would mean he would get away with posting unnesssary false information, so no, don't let him get away with nothing!

elmacaco wrote:Yo man, I don't see the archives link.

I believe you roopesh, I just want to read their blurb.

No dis to MPC3000, but if the MPC 3k is based on S3000 technology, then it could be said that it has it's sound engine. A vague term I know, but still.

Also, if the S3000 has more features, the inverse of your statement is more correct.

The S3000 can sound like the MPC 3000, but the MPC 3000 can't always be made to sound like the S3000.

The envelopes on the mpc are not adsr, but I imagine those on the S 3000 are. Bit rates, DA AD convesion, if all that can line up, Roopesh does have a point, but it is important to qualify it.

NEither of you are wrong, we just need to go deeper into the positions to work out what the details and exceptions are.

macman wrote:Roopesh. Your only knowledge is between your balls!!!!

Anyone that rates Logic Plugin's no **** about sound or what it takes to make a fat mix. Try upgrading your bedroom setup for a TDM rig.

Softsynths/EXS/NI/ all **** !!!!!!!!

I bet you run some **** 02r Digital **** or even a behringer.


Get a real job!!!!!!