By Flub
Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:34 pm
Hey there,
I have a mpc 60 and love the way i can work with it. Especially because i can use it as main Midi Sequencer in my setup. I like the freedom to choose if i want the internal samplers sound or an better quality s950 sampler or even newer ones.
The only fear i have is that the timing of the sequencer itself is always inaccurate and gives a touch to the sequences i cannot choose because it is always there if i work with the 60.
Now... because I also have a 3000 here for repair i programmed a standard beat on both machines.
the machines control the s950, so the sound source is independant.
I recorded the s950 output 3 times:
1. time : MPC60 triggering the s950
2. time : exactly same sequence on the 3000 triggering the s950
3. time : mpc3000 as syncmaster for the mpc60 which then plays the sequence
result:
I am quite surprised and happy that the difference is not easy if at all noticable.
what do you think?
I think the 3000s internal sampler is faster than the 60s, thats why the 60 doesnt sound as tight as the 3000 when triggering the onboard sampler.
this is the soundfile:
http://www.box.com/s/0ef2eaafc1ff1d911450
(mh i dont know if I really hear any differences but, a little ibt i feels like that 3000s part has more energy and the last one is the fattest, but i dont trust these feelings)
peace out,
Flo
I have a mpc 60 and love the way i can work with it. Especially because i can use it as main Midi Sequencer in my setup. I like the freedom to choose if i want the internal samplers sound or an better quality s950 sampler or even newer ones.
The only fear i have is that the timing of the sequencer itself is always inaccurate and gives a touch to the sequences i cannot choose because it is always there if i work with the 60.
Now... because I also have a 3000 here for repair i programmed a standard beat on both machines.
the machines control the s950, so the sound source is independant.
I recorded the s950 output 3 times:
1. time : MPC60 triggering the s950
2. time : exactly same sequence on the 3000 triggering the s950
3. time : mpc3000 as syncmaster for the mpc60 which then plays the sequence
result:
I am quite surprised and happy that the difference is not easy if at all noticable.
what do you think?
I think the 3000s internal sampler is faster than the 60s, thats why the 60 doesnt sound as tight as the 3000 when triggering the onboard sampler.
this is the soundfile:
http://www.box.com/s/0ef2eaafc1ff1d911450
(mh i dont know if I really hear any differences but, a little ibt i feels like that 3000s part has more energy and the last one is the fattest, but i dont trust these feelings)
peace out,
Flo
http://www.soundcloud.com/mephistomc
Need MPC60 / ASQ10 SCSI Expansion ?
Need MPC3000 new high contrast LED display? write me !
Need MPC60 / ASQ10 SCSI Expansion ?
Need MPC3000 new high contrast LED display? write me !
Last edited by Flub on Sat Apr 14, 2012 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.


