By nathakai
Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:40 am
Thanks, appreciate it, I don't have OS 3.5 or CF drive in mine but still love !!!!.
classytouch wrote:If you sample audio in and assign it to a pad it doesn't sound the same as it does coming through the record screen. What's going on in there?
Wal Martian wrote:classytouch wrote:If you sample audio in and assign it to a pad it doesn't sound the same as it does coming through the record screen. What's going on in there?
I've heard of the same thing happening on the 2000/2000xl. Trim screen is louder and "warmer" sounding than triggering the same sound in main screen. Could just be a quirk of the machine.
richie wrote:I thought the "compression" was for compressing the actual size of file and not actual plugin type compression.
Also just an idea here -- were the gain settings on the 60 the same as the S3000 when sampling?
Wal Martian wrote:classytouch wrote:If you sample audio in and assign it to a pad it doesn't sound the same as it does coming through the record screen. What's going on in there?
I've heard of the same thing happening on the 2000/2000xl. Trim screen is louder and "warmer" sounding than triggering the same sound in main screen. Could just be a quirk of the machine.
Boef1 wrote:Here is the sound test I refered to a while back.
"I did a sound test back to back with the 3000 and the 60. Sampled a drum break at same level. Threshhold allmost the same. it workes a bit different on the two mpc. 3000 has the rec nob. 60 dosent. But I sampled the break in as loud as i could with out distorting the sound. put it out on seperate channels through my mixer. And to my surprise the 3000 was more punchier and loud and loud. "
classytouch wrote:Boef1 wrote:Here is the sound test I refered to a while back.
"I did a sound test back to back with the 3000 and the 60. Sampled a drum break at same level. Threshhold allmost the same. it workes a bit different on the two mpc. 3000 has the rec nob. 60 dosent. But I sampled the break in as loud as i could with out distorting the sound. put it out on seperate channels through my mixer. And to my surprise the 3000 was more punchier and loud and loud. "
Wow. I didn't even know you posted this! The 60 sound sweet! The 3000 sound amazing! Big, warn, punchy, and clear. Great post! My 3000's going nowhere!
JUKE 179r wrote:classytouch wrote:@ JUKE179r how have you been going about your file management in the 3000?
dumbeat wrote:Both scsi2sd and raizenmonster inside the machine?
How is that done?
Spod wrote:What's the final word for internal card readers in 3000s? I've got an external SCSI CF reader which is flaky and annoying and i'd like to have it all in one. Is the SD reader through the vent or the CF internal reader the better implementation, and where do you get them? So many dead links and out of date info around for this stuff.
tapedeck wrote:Wal Martian wrote:I've heard of the same thing happening on the 2000/2000xl. Trim screen is louder and "warmer" sounding than triggering the same sound in main screen. Could just be a quirk of the machine.
that and just the fact of digitising it. when its just running through the input screen you aren't hearing the actual sample, its just passing audio through it's own input circuitry. once you get it recorded, bits / samplerate will have an impact.