Share your knowledge on these two classic MPCs
User avatar
By deck daddy Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:57 pm
Probably not a new and great find, but:

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/1994_articles/oct94/akaimpc3000.html

These SOS articles are always positive with some pros and cons, but it's interesting to go back 14 years in time and read what thoughts came up around the 3000 when it was new. And the subjects, even the "hardware vs software battle", are a lot of the same things we discuss today.

He is not too happy about the computer screen + too visual part of music:

"...next time you are in a studio with a computer-sequenced track playing, take a furtive look at the people around you. They will all have their eyes glued to the screen, watching the cursor creeping across and giving that their full attention rather than simply listening to the music. The computer screen is like a magnet, drawing your concentration away from what is really important. A piece of advice sometimes given to aspiring orchestral conductors is 'the score in your head, not your head in the score', meaning that you shouldn't rely on looking at the printed music; you should have absorbed it and know it by heart. Hardware sequencers actually encourage this attitude, because you only look at the display when you are actively doing something; as the music plays, you'll probably just sit back and listen."

WOOORD UP

By zeusmajor Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:55 pm
Sound On Sound wrote:...mentioned in the manual, is that the machine will randomly play or miss out the last 20ms or so of a sample...

He did specify that his model was an early one, but I did not know that this was ever an issue.

Still it's kinda cool that aside from that one line he literally had not one bad thing to say about the 3K. :D
Sound On Sound wrote:...Another point is that, although you can edit any aspect of the MIDI data, it isn't possible to easily change the timing of a single note. I would have liked to be able to position the cursor on the bar/beat/clock reference of a note and dial in a new value....

This is incorrect.

Maybe the early os didn't have the <Move Existing> option in the Timing Correct page, but again that's news to me.

Paul
User avatar

By 7 1 4 Beats Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:07 pm
zeusmajor wrote:
Sound On Sound wrote:...mentioned in the manual, is that the machine will randomly play or miss out the last 20ms or so of a sample...

He did specify that his model was an early one, but I did not know that this was ever an issue.

Still it's kinda cool that aside from that one line he literally had not one bad thing to say about the 3K. :D
Sound On Sound wrote:...Another point is that, although you can edit any aspect of the MIDI data, it isn't possible to easily change the timing of a single note. I would have liked to be able to position the cursor on the bar/beat/clock reference of a note and dial in a new value....

This is incorrect.

Maybe the early os didn't have the <Move Existing> option in the Timing Correct page, but again that's news to me.

Paul


I don't think the first OS which was like 3.03 had it but I maybe wrong 'm sure Rohan knows.