Share your knowledge on these two classic MPCs
User avatar
By UK Starski Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:21 pm
Are any of you using the 3000 to senquence SP1200 sounds ? I heard there is .pgm file is available on the net which has been setup so that all the banks on the SP are in ling with the MPC 3000 ....
By Deta!L Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:34 am
really? this should be super easy man, should have taken longer to post this than to actually do it yourself
User avatar
By deck daddy Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:17 pm
I have the SP12000 .PGM file. I can send it to you if you PM me your email.

I haven't tried it myself tho'. I like to seqence my SP1200 samples with the SP1200's sequencer. I like that sequencer. I love the whole machine: few choices and menu's makes the workflow fast. I'm much faster with the SP1200 than with my MPC.

Holler!
User avatar
By J2kxl Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:28 am
Deta!L wrote:really? this should be super easy man, should have taken longer to post this than to actually do it yourself


Thanks for the quote.
User avatar
By tbiggz Thu Jul 03, 2008 9:02 pm
I like to seqence my SP1200 samples with the SP1200's sequencer.


Agreed, i've never noticed any advantage to triggering the SP from the MPC. To me, it just sound like an MPC loaded with some SP12 samples. That can work too, but if you actually *have* an SP, it always seems to sound nicer just working on its sequencer and slaving the MPC to it (if you're adding more samples etc..).
User avatar
By tbiggz Fri Jul 04, 2008 9:41 pm
I guess that would give you the impetus to use the MPC as the interface, but for me, I still wouldn't bother. If it's two drum pads that don't work, I would just assign sounds elsewhere - you still have 24 sounds you can trigger. Maybe it's the sequencer pads though... then you're in trouble. Anyway, good luck.
User avatar
By deck daddy Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:28 pm
One of the reasons to use the MPC's pads instead of the SP1200 is the dynamic pads that responds a bit different than the SP1200's plastic buttons. Good for hi-hats and such.

But myself, I use my SP1200 and MPC3000 seperately even though they stand right next to eachother. I kind of like the plastic buttons to! But I think I have to try out how the hi-hats will be with the MPC pads.

How did that file work that I sent you?
User avatar
By UK Starski Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:38 am
Yeah thanks man .... the SP1200 PGM file work great ....

I'm Do all my shit on my MPC cos i'm used to it & my SP1200 has some broken buttons too ... bu it's all good !!!

Thanks again !


How do u trigger sounds from your MPC using your Sp1200 ?

Why do you perferer sequencing on the SP ???
User avatar
By deck daddy Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:23 pm
UK Starski wrote:How do u trigger sounds from your MPC using your Sp1200 ?


You assign sounds according to the midi number from the sp1200. It's just like hooking a synth to the MPC. You use a MIDI and not a DRUM setting in your sequencer or something like that. I have only used synths with MPCs.


UK Starski wrote:Why do you perferer sequencing on the SP ???


Because it's fast and easy.

With my MPC i have many options with timing correction settings and stuff like that. Many individual tracks for each sample and so on.
But still it's faster for me to just go ahead and place my stuff with the SP's sequencer. It's just record+trig. Either with timing on or no timing correction at all. It also makes me laying more notes without correction.

And I use my ear even more with my SP. The display shows minimum infrmation.

Of course I double the BPM on my SP (I also do this on my MPC) to get double the resolution.

But I love the MPC's sequencer too. But I love working at one machine at a time. I like to load one floppy and there is the whole beat. One output. One unit turned on.

But I will try using the MPC's pads for the velocity stuff. Maybe it will improve my SP beats' dynamics. (tho I usually copy samples and give them different volume settings giving dynamics)
User avatar
By deck daddy Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:01 pm
If you are making a beat in 90 BPM type in 180 BPM in your sequencer. Or tap double time when finding the tempo, and it will pop to 180 instead of 90.

This will give you double the resolution!

-Plus you get faster count-in metronome on the MPC. I don't like to wait a whole bar before laying drums.
(And after using the 1200 for a long time I have stopped using the count-in function at all. It's not that necessary anymore.)