By es-k
Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:25 pm
damn time flies, missed the battle... ill vote after work
peace
peace
inflict3 wrote:so am i up or not?? i see my beat on the sc group, still aint on the polls though, oh well, i tried..
S.I.C.K THE DRUMGOD wrote:sick drumkid - i actually really dug your track
^^^
LOL@ drum "kid" My son is 19,and probably bigger and taller than most of y`all.LOL
Thanks for listening,I decided to just do me this time around and not sweat the competition aspect.I slammed down 3 tall cans and got busy.It took about 13 takes because I was faded.I will return to form next time....maybe.I like the freedom of my "drunken style"
pk1 wrote:selfinflict - the twenty seconds you chose to freak the beat was real fresh. with the rules saying "beats should run under 90 seconds" you should have kept you track smaller. then it wouldn't have been a redundant 2.5 mins of a 2 bar loop.
Tapuno wrote:No, its not the fat **** I was supposed to **** but never did.
And, no that is not a dude. Its my sister.
QuickStrike wrote::smoker: Looks to me a lot of you did not follow the rules. I thought there was a 90 sec limit and no out side drums hint hint. Come on if y'all can't follow the rules then why have them.
Obi-Dan-Kenobi wrote: if your going to set requirements, then vote for the guy that went by them, at least, you know the work they put in, to sound different, and a good beat at the same time, time lengths are not important
Toothflesh wrote:Obi-Dan-Kenobi wrote: if your going to set requirements, then vote for the guy that went by them, at least, you know the work they put in, to sound different, and a good beat at the same time, time lengths are not important
if everybody would follow the rules then there wouldnt be any discussion about this
Isnt it the challenge to follow the rules and come up with something dope?