Teenage Engineering released the MPC Mini ... sort of ...

glide wrote: Really.. are you positive on this info? .. someone from TE had previously commented that a filter per pad (vs per group) would be too CPU heavy and would mean sacrificing poly ..

In fact I hope TE just addresses this on the next prints for the future of the upcoming range, as its a small mechanical cost vs the workflow performance

would not hold breath for endless encoders maybe mk2 but surely that is several years away 3-5+ years

resampling would negate the need for per pad fx

yup am certain bout the processor being dual core but currently only one core is begin used.

Yhea Im not holding my breath on endless encoders, it would require cost, Id imagine it falls under designing copyright that needs to be registered

Yet on the flip side it could be written as promotional endeavor .. as surly it would buzz up promotion/sales.. they could use the opportunity to add additional labeling..

Surely they are aware that the encoders are the "ball drop" in workflow, it be the same downside on other engines in this line, so why not take care of now foe the sake of greatness...

I can imagine the frustration of unintentionally moving a chop point every time you want to make an adjustment or any edit for that matter ..its a small nightmare tbh ..please correct me if I am mistaken

But there's still no denying the audio quality of these cuties, and if there's plenty of cpu left, they can take it very far, resampling alone will make it extremely capable,
also recording of pad fx /perhaps under MIDI cc control,so one could externally sequence FX..also wish it had a lach on the FX option so one could easily trigger FX in a live set with one hand..

Anyway TE just released an OS update yesterday .. all bug fixes.. so they are on track ..