By 1TIME4URMINDS
Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:07 pm
I have made a lof of tests.
Here's the result , the s950 have a limitation due to its Operating System for saving data via IB105 or IB109.
Here's the test I have done with my s950 (maxed memory 2.25Mb) + IB105 Mk2 + prototype CF card reader.
The s950 can format and recognize 2Gb & 4GB SD cards. I have created 128 voumes (empty partition) maximum.
I have sampled 30sec (94% of the internal at bandwith 19200 / maximum sample rate) in the S950.
I have saved the 30sec duration sample in 32 partition. I tried to store in the 33th volume but I had a message on the s950 screen saying : Hard disk full !!!!!
So I have sampled 94% of the s950 memory.
2.25Mb = 2304kb
2034kb * 94% = 2165.76kb
2165.76kb x 32 (volumes stored) = 69304.32kb
69304.32kb / 1024kb (1Mb) = 67.68Mb around 68Mb
The s950 with IB105 Mk2 is able to save 68Mb of data in a 2Gb SD card.
That's not a lot but that the maximum the OS 1.1 & 1.2A are programmed to do.
The limitation is nearly the same as IB109 with SCSI 100Mb zip drive , it's possible to save only 64Mb in a 100Mb zip disk.
From IB109 manual : The IB-109 is designed for use with the SYQUEST SQ555 removable hard diskunit (44 Mbytes). Use the above model its equivalent.
Note:
Even with a SCSI hard disk unit of a larger storage capacity, you cannot take advantage of its larger capacity because the IB-109 can handle only up to 64 Mbytes.
Regarding this , I consider that the IB105 Mk2 will be a solid alternative to IB109. With a better device for storing and loading data. SD card is much better than Zip disk.
S of SD means SECURE , D means DIGITAL.
I will make test with smaller SD cards size like 128Mb & 512Mb that are less expensive ($3.00 / $4.00) than 2Gb ($7.00).
Does it make sense? Opinions are welcame.
Here's the result , the s950 have a limitation due to its Operating System for saving data via IB105 or IB109.
Here's the test I have done with my s950 (maxed memory 2.25Mb) + IB105 Mk2 + prototype CF card reader.
The s950 can format and recognize 2Gb & 4GB SD cards. I have created 128 voumes (empty partition) maximum.
I have sampled 30sec (94% of the internal at bandwith 19200 / maximum sample rate) in the S950.
I have saved the 30sec duration sample in 32 partition. I tried to store in the 33th volume but I had a message on the s950 screen saying : Hard disk full !!!!!
So I have sampled 94% of the s950 memory.
2.25Mb = 2304kb
2034kb * 94% = 2165.76kb
2165.76kb x 32 (volumes stored) = 69304.32kb
69304.32kb / 1024kb (1Mb) = 67.68Mb around 68Mb
The s950 with IB105 Mk2 is able to save 68Mb of data in a 2Gb SD card.
That's not a lot but that the maximum the OS 1.1 & 1.2A are programmed to do.
The limitation is nearly the same as IB109 with SCSI 100Mb zip drive , it's possible to save only 64Mb in a 100Mb zip disk.
From IB109 manual : The IB-109 is designed for use with the SYQUEST SQ555 removable hard diskunit (44 Mbytes). Use the above model its equivalent.
Note:
Even with a SCSI hard disk unit of a larger storage capacity, you cannot take advantage of its larger capacity because the IB-109 can handle only up to 64 Mbytes.
Regarding this , I consider that the IB105 Mk2 will be a solid alternative to IB109. With a better device for storing and loading data. SD card is much better than Zip disk.
S of SD means SECURE , D means DIGITAL.
I will make test with smaller SD cards size like 128Mb & 512Mb that are less expensive ($3.00 / $4.00) than 2Gb ($7.00).
Does it make sense? Opinions are welcame.




