Fre$hBreath wrote:
The thing is they are not cheap knockoffs.
The reason Behringer can afford to sell their products at lower prices is because they own an entire manufacturing city in China and acquired the companies who make the analog filter chips, opamps, capacitors, and resistors that Roland, Yamaha, Korg, and Moog uses for their synths.
CharlesRandolph wrote:Fre$hBreath wrote:
The thing is they are not cheap knockoffs.
The reason Behringer can afford to sell their products at lower prices is because they own an entire manufacturing city in China and acquired the companies who make the analog filter chips, opamps, capacitors, and resistors that Roland, Yamaha, Korg, and Moog uses for their synths.
Corrections, Behringer has partnered with the Chinese Government in a manufacturing city. No outside company owns, anything in China. Everything is a partnership with their Government. Sound to me like China is using Behringer, a German company, as a middle man, to get their products into the US.
Due to the US/China Trade war, Behringer, had to ramp up their product release schedule. Hence, the constant barrage of new equipment each week.
Fre$hBreath wrote:Do you have any legitimate trade news sources to back up your claim about Behringer being a partnership with the Chinese Government? Because I can't find any information to verify your comment...
Fre$hBreath wrote:Do you have any legitimate trade news sources to back up your claim about Behringer being a partnership with the Chinese Government? Because I can't find any information to verify your comment...
mr_debauch wrote:still nice that someone is putting in the legwork roland refused to do for all these years... roland can look to the future in every other product category (like keyboard arrangers and laser printers that do 48 inch wide paper) while someone else makes the roland gear people want.
Cockdiesel wrote:Seems interesting but I’m finding some decent flaws with what I’m hearing.
First this is a weak attempt at a matriarch clone like the crave is to the mother 32... except with the moog you get quality tone on the oscillators, quality attached effects and quality all around really.
This thing displays what I didn’t like about the model d sound, the thin distortion prone sound with debatable quality on the analog “Juno chorus”, sorry bro but it sounded wack as ****.
I hate to sound so negative, I’m interested in this but into all impressions had me comparing to something far superior... I also had a model d and could see the drawbacks clear as day.
okaaaaaay....Cockdiesel wrote:Just saying my opinion. The thing is cool, but my first impressions weren’t the greatest. Sometimes opinions change, sometimes not.
The model d didn’t give me a “moog” feel. I liked the moog iPad app More than it.
I’m not trying to come off haterish, which I may, the thing is cool. I’m sure it won’t be priced like a matriarch but there’s some steep differences you get with the two.
Is it ok to say that thing is no moog?
Cockdiesel wrote:Just saying my opinion. The thing is cool, but my first impressions weren’t the greatest. Sometimes opinions change, sometimes not.
The model d didn’t give me a “moog” feel. I liked the moog iPad app More than it.
I’m not trying to come off haterish, which I may, the thing is cool. I’m sure it won’t be priced like a matriarch but there’s some steep differences you get with the two.
Is it ok to say that thing is no moog?
