Cockdiesel wrote:I was just reading that on GS. There actually simple mods people were doing to get finer resolution on the 60s.
You're probably referring to the resistor mods people put in for the resonance so that it goes crazy closer to 60 instead of the 40-50 mark. It's a clever hack for analogue gear, and allows you to alter the control voltage curve by quite effectively reducing the voltage that is passed on. Not sure I'm interested in doing that myself, but the technique is certainly sound enough to be applicable to the VX 90.
Cockdiesel wrote:They were also describing how one of the unique features was getting more of a FM type deal going because the OSC can modulate the filter, which at least to them made more sense to get super wicked resonance.
Since it is a VCO instead of a DCO, there is a world of weird Voltage Control that *could* be applied from modular gear. Personally that's probably a touch too far for me, as I don't want to accidentally fry the synth on accident.
Cockdiesel wrote:And yes, Please post examples. I’m sure there’s a few synth tech geeks out there who would appreciate it as well.
I'll see if I can get some time today... just need to determine if it makes for a better quick Youtube video, or just a short audio track to post on Soundcloud. *shrug*
Cockdiesel wrote:I’m trying to wrap my head around what the synth sampler combo going through the filters and envelope might achieve beyond stacking OSC into a monster. I mean from what I’ve read so far the keyboard synths were bitimbral, and you can use a 0-6 voice allocation. I’d be interested to see if you can do drum and synth combos. Like a rudimentary workstation, if even possible. The set up seems pretty complex.
As far as I understand, the VX 90 lacks some, if not all of the bitimbral options that the AX 73 had. I haven't even started to dig in there so definitely a whole world of things to explore for sure.
I don't have the 13 pin cable yet. Had to order one from Europe, so it'll probably be a few weeks before it gets here. When I get to mess around with it will then depend on whether I am moved, or feel like unpacking the S950 to give it a try.
I believe if you are going to use the S950 as a sound source for the VX 90, you need to prepare six key groups, one for each OSC, and each one has to be assigned a MIDI note from 1 to 6. My understanding is that the configuration is Sequencer MIDI out -> VX 90 MIDI in, and VX 90 MIDI out to S950 Midi in. It sounds like the VX 90 effectively takes control over the S950 and then it chooses which samples to play. There *might* be some interesting application of having different sounds on the S950 programs... but I can also envision this turning into madness if you don't understand how the VX90 selects samples to play.
I suspect the use of six oscillators is just to line up with the architecture of the VX 90, and not a direct limitation of what either box *could* do. This does technically leave you with 2 additional notes of polyphony/audio outs on the S950, but I suspect you won't be able to address them from the Sequencer to the S950 through the VX 90. Could be wrong on that though... so my suspicion is that you won't be able to effectively use the S950 as both drums and separately use the S950 as an oscillator source for the VX 90 without using some modern gear to inject yourself between the midi notes at the VX 90 Midi Out -> (something) -> S950 Midi In...
I can imagine the S950/VX90 being more hassle than it is worth, but I'm hoping the Tauntek firmware upgrade opening up many parameters to being controlled by CC will help. Plus I suspect a practical use for an Init disk or two that I can sample on the S950 in a few different ways and be able to have pre named and assigned sounds to key groups will absolutely help streamline things here. Similarly, I'll probably map out a handful of Init/Input on the VX90, which ought to help streamline further. With an MPC midi program mapping important Q-Links to CC to control the VX90... I can imagine this working quite well.
Things that the S950 offers the combo
* LFO that can target S950 parameters
* Envelopes to control S950 parameters
* Non resonant low pass filter
* Samples as Oscillator sources
* Variable Sample Rate
Things that the VX90 offers the combo
* LFO that can target VX90 VCO/VCF/VCA
* Option to include VCO to thicken the sound or not
* Envelopes to control VX90 VCO/VCA/VCF
* Resonant low pass filter
* Non resonant high pass filter
* Stereo Chorus Effect
What this means for application I suspect is
* More complex sounds through the use of LFOs and Envelopes
* Stack the LPFs for a steeper low pass filter
* LPF resonance for the S950 when you want it
* An HPF for the S950 when you want it
* Stereo Chorus Effect for S950
That's where my head is at right now at least.
A few things I need to dig into later:
* Is the LPF/HPF on the VX90 per voice or for the entire mix
* How to actually setup the VX90/S950 combo properly
* Create Init/Templates for the whole thing
* Backup my VX90 settings (I think it is just factory)
* Re-read the manuals again... and maybe the S900 manual... since the S950 manual is sometimes a bit wonky
* Can I get VC -> Midi CC and do some clever modulation of VX90 parameters