By
roxstar
Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:34 pm
I used the sp-1200, and I own the emax. The difference in sound is UN-NOTICABLE when you play the music. Sure you can tell a slight difference, but you can't notice anything when the beat is playing. I don't know anyone anal enough to need the exact replication of any machine.. if it sounds good, it sounds good. Nahmean?
Anyways, the emax has a choice of different sample rates. from 10,16,20,28,31 and 42khz. How dope is that? It can sample clean, or dirty. 10 is almost too low, 16 has the ring mod sound like the sp-1200, but the 20 is a nice dirt sound, but not too clean.. nice for drums, and 28 is nice for longer samples that you basically want to add a lil character too. Anyone that tryies to convince you to get the SP-1200 over the emax doesn't know what their talking about. I would buy the sp-1200 for it's sound and the sequencer, but since your using the MPC, all you need is the sound. AN SP-1200 will hit you for at least $1000.00. I got my Emax for $125 on ebay. So if your willing to spend an extra $875.00 to get the exact sound, then go ahead, but like I said before, no one will notice.
In fact, I've been using lots of samplers, and the casio RZ-1 is a cheap but perfect percussion sampler. The memory is so limited that there is no need to edit your samples.. as soon as it begins to sample, it stops. I really enjoyed that box. The emax, I would never sell. Not because I own it, but it's so flexible. The analog filters are a beast. A third party OS would be great. There is a SCSI hook-up inthe back, but the OS is so old you can only save 20 megs on a 100 meg zip disk. I usually just sample into the mpc tho.
It's a nice sampler.. hands down the best dirty sampler I own. If I could cram more internal memory into it, I probably wouldn't need anything else.
Last edited by roxstar on Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:16 am, edited 1 time in total.