apricotandpearjam wrote:yea you said it well MaZe...
i also would be using maschine if it had the sequencing workflow of the MPC.
the MPC just makes sense to me, maschine doesnt.
BUT... it has a long way to go before it has everything else that maschine has.
the renaissance is a skeleton, maschine is a well built sexy lady, but with not a lot of intuition.
the renaissance now needs to learn how to be a sexy lady...
100% agreed. Coming from an MPC background, the Maschine's sequencer, though I understand it very well, isn't great, at all. The whole pattern/group/arranger situation is clunky. But as we agree, the Ren has a LONG way to go, and I mean years, before it gets to the level of Maschine in terms of bells and whistles. I just picked up the Maschine about a month ago so I avoided it's early software years which I heard were pretty bad as well. Thing is, by the time the Ren catches up to where it needs to be on a very basic level, the Maschine will probably be years ahead once again. And again, I HATE to compare the two but these are just facts. Had the Ren come out the gate with all of the necessary BASIC features of an MPC, we wouldn't even be having this conversation as we'd be looking for the "sexy" in 1.4 and not the basic. The Maschine is at 1.8 and is definitely "sexy". It took some years to get there. The Ren is going to be at 1.4 very soon and hopefully it will feature the basics. I don't see the Ren getting the "sexy" for years. And then, you get to the situation where the new Akai has pretty much sullied their reputation in the eyes of many consumers through the constant dropping/discontinuation of unfinished products, i.e. the 5000. We can only hope, and I truly hope, that Akai actually continues to support the Ren and doesn't drop it as they have their most recent offerings. If history is the best predictor of the future though...well, we'll see. As I see it now, this is basically their last chance.