I have nothing against his setup. I used to work like that. That's why I know managing a large MIDI network is counter productive for me. From Cabling, Routing, Swapping Out Gear, Back up sound setting, Dealing with Bulk Dumps. Returning gear because of the way they've implement MIDI, Project Archiving, Project Recall, Constant Trouble Shooting, Constantly re patching, Multi passes causing the user to recheck the sync and realign inside the computer.
Not to mention having a larger enough mixer and audio interface, with enough inputs and outputs, etc. I've been there 1000%. When it work well it's a beautiful thing. But when it doesn't, it's a living hell. If you throw in deadline, changes, other things, it can driver a person looney. Also I still run a Hybrid setup, however I just removed 90% of the head ache. At some point, we stop working the gear, and it starts to work us.
Let's not forget collaborating in your space. If you ever want to see, how well oiled your setup is. Get someone else in there and try to explain your setup.
Cockdiesel wrote:Charles- I wouldn’t say all that. You’re using a 4000 for its specific work flow just as him using his vintage sampler. There’s a lot of an experience with using the live and other standalone gear. You may be a different type of user but I see exactly where mono is coming from. There’s no reason that his system will be any less productive than your workflow or anyone else’s. The most productive work flow I’ve had is a mpc live and a mini ak.... any opinion on that just a opinion, but personally I was able to dig into the fundamentals of programming and actually playing keys, etc. however not much finished product was produced. As an “artist” there is a spectrum that is no cookie cutter fit.
You may work from of an “industry” setting but other are out here trying to really challenge their mind and get creative.