By SuperKonquer
Mon Jun 15, 2026 11:26 pm
MrDobalina wrote:I cant say what's better or worse for you. For me, that method seems like a lot of things to do and remember. Saving a midi program let's you load the program and it is then loaded however you saved it. You can load it on any track that you like so you are never locked to a template. You can save a midi program to match your hardware unit (or software) then put that hardware in a closet for year. When you dust it off and use it again a year later, you can just load that midi program. You can do all your hardware this way so your midi assignments are not tied to one file that you have to load everything every time. This gives you a bit more flexibility imo. More importantly, it makes setting up hardware drop dead easy with no need to remember what you set up 2 years ago.SuperKonquer wrote:I think you'd be better off creating a midi program. Then you can recall your q-link assignments by just loading that program. You can expand this by using the project pages if you want to macro them.
Thanks - I'm curious for more info on what you think this makes better or easier?
Currently, I have set the mapping up once and I never had to to do it again. Using the one big midi file, my tracks line up in the right place. If I import new midi files, and I can copy those new track data to the pre-existing / mapped tracks.
Truthfully, I left 5 'unused' midi tracks and thats where my mappings live so I never have to mess with them.
But I haven't had to change or re-set up anything re: midi control since the first time I did it.
So, as a fairly mpc live noob, what benefit to I get from a MIDI Program?





