LivePsy wrote:The praise for the MPC One seems strange to me. Its the low cost and its peeps coming from synths and DAWS.
One MIDI in and one MIDI out.
One stereo pair out.
You have got to be kidding.
LivePsy wrote:The praise for the MPC One seems strange to me. Its the low cost and its peeps coming from synths and DAWS.
One MIDI in and one MIDI out.
One stereo pair out.
You have got to be kidding.
LivePsy wrote:The praise for the MPC One seems strange to me. Its the low cost and its peeps coming from synths and DAWS.
One MIDI in and one MIDI out.
One stereo pair out.
You have got to be kidding.
Ultros wrote:
10 in 8 out and all the adat you wanna snort.
For what a user pays for an mpc-x i have got an mpc one, the umc 1820, a microkorg, a microfreak, a 303 clone, a set of monitors... what does the mpc x user gain for the same money spent? i mean in terms of audio development. whether you use an mpc x or mpc one doesnt really matter.. dudes are gonna produce the same quality shit on either one... may as well go for the one that costs less and snap up some other good studio purchases so you dont put all your eggs in one basket and end up making mpc music rather than studio music.
8ty8 wrote:
I forgot where I read it, but someone was saying that they prefer the One over an X, and that was just an absolutely hilarious read. Dude must really love that shift key
Ultros wrote:LivePsy wrote:The praise for the MPC One seems strange to me. Its the low cost and its peeps coming from synths and DAWS.
One MIDI in and one MIDI out.
One stereo pair out.
You have got to be kidding.
10 in 8 out and all the adat you wanna snort.
For what a user pays for an mpc-x i have got an mpc one, the umc 1820, a microkorg, a microfreak, a 303 clone, a set of monitors... what does the mpc x user gain for the same money spent? i mean in terms of audio development. whether you use an mpc x or mpc one doesnt really matter.. dudes are gonna produce the same quality shit on either one... may as well go for the one that costs less and snap up some other good studio purchases so you dont put all your eggs in one basket and end up making mpc music rather than studio music.
Juxx wrote:The X was a different level…….
The X just seemed ergonomically near perfect... and the dem 16 Q's were great.
LivePsy wrote:The praise for the MPC One seems strange to me. Its the low cost and its peeps coming from synths and DAWS.
One MIDI in and one MIDI out.
One stereo pair out.
You have got to be kidding.
Juxx wrote:The X was a different level I like to finger drum and watch TNG reruns for hours.
jpeg wrote:lot of people dont use a bunch of external equipment; especially witht he inbuilt synths; also many use bounce to wave stems so multiples outputs and multiple midi i/o is not required for a lot of users, also alot of instruments do midi over usb, so again no need for the extra midi I/O
EnochLight wrote:Juxx wrote:The X was a different level I like to finger drum and watch TNG reruns for hours.
You been keeping up on Season 3 of Picard? I hate watched S1 and S2, but S3 is just on a whole different level (read: it's awesome).
Monotremata wrote:jpeg wrote:lot of people dont use a bunch of external equipment; especially witht he inbuilt synths; also many use bounce to wave stems so multiples outputs and multiple midi i/o is not required for a lot of users, also alot of instruments do midi over usb, so again no need for the extra midi I/O
Did that info come from the same place that made you so sure MPC OS 3.0 was going to be shown at NAMM? Cause its about as legit as that..
EnochLight wrote:You been keeping up on Season 3 of Picard? I hate watched S1 and S2, but S3 is just on a whole different level (read: it's awesome).
