NearTao wrote:1. MPC X - 8 CV out over TS, MPC One needs 4x TRS splitters
2. Control up to 64 devices over MIDI instead of 16 (yeah you can use USB
3. Ableton Live Control
4. 16 Knobs of Q-Link Control
5. Q-Link output for all 16 knobs vs MPC One's 4 on screen display
6. Larger screen 10" vs 7"
7. 2 Stereo inputs vs 1 Stereo input
8. Input monitoring/direct switching
9. Dedicated buttons for more functions and features on MPC X
10. Adjustable display angle on the MPC X
11. Support for internal SSD drive
12. Able to natively mount drives of MPC X when in controller mode
I'm sure there's a few more... but that's what I rattled off the top of my head.
EDIT:
Now of those 12 you've listed, get rid of 6 that you don't need.1. MPC X - 8 CV out over TS, MPC One needs 4x TRS splitters
Good.2. Control up to 64 devices over MIDI instead of 16 (yeah you can use USB)
USB KILLED THAT3. Ableton Live Control
What if they use Cubase or Reason?4. 16 Knobs of Q-Link Control
(Add a MIDI CONTROL)5. Q-Link output for all 16 knobs vs MPC One's 4 on screen display
Not a deal breaker6. Larger screen 10" vs 7"
Not a deal breaker7. 2 Stereo inputs vs 1 Stereo input
Good.8. Input monitoring/direct switching
Good.9. Dedicated buttons for more functions and features on MPC X
Not a deal breaker10. Adjustable display angle on the MPC X
Not a deal breaker11. Support for internal SSD drive
Not a deal breaker12. Able to natively mount drives of MPC X when in controller mode
Not a deal breaker (False Developer limitation.)These are the one I see for myself that shows a difference, where there's no work around
or Developer False Limitation. Now the question is will you spend $1400+ for those 12 things you listed?
1. MPC X - 8 CV out over TS, MPC One needs 4x TRS splitters
7. 2 Stereo inputs vs 1 Stereo input
8. Input monitoring/direct switching
I'll addFoot Switch
10 out MPC X vs 2 out MPC ONE