By Lampdog
Mon Jun 05, 2023 11:05 am
Negatory
No subscriptions.
No subscriptions.
NearTao wrote:While at it, Akai should also have a bug bounty pool, so that people can vote on what features/fixes they want. So basically the more votes for a specific request, the more likely (though not guaranteed) the request will be to get implemented.
And then they can add a tiered subscription system, so that the more you pay, the more votes you get for requesting specific bugs or features to be fixed.
NearTao wrote:While at it, Akai should also have a bug bounty pool, so that people can vote on what features/fixes they want. So basically the more votes for a specific request, the more likely (though not guaranteed) the request will be to get implemented.
And then they can add a tiered subscription system, so that the more you pay, the more votes you get for requesting specific bugs or features to be fixed.
Monotremata wrote:Nah hardware subscriptions are trash plain and simple.
People need to stop pandering to companies and make them put out decent reliable products from the start like they're supposed to.
NearTao wrote:While at it, Akai should also have a bug bounty pool, so that people can vote on what features/fixes they want. So basically the more votes for a specific request, the more likely (though not guaranteed) the request will be to get implemented.
And then they can add a tiered subscription system, so that the more you pay, the more votes you get for requesting specific bugs or features to be fixed.
Certified Beatz wrote:So this answer it all about subscription in the DAW field..
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vp1ALpWts98
SakisX wrote:NearTao wrote:While at it, Akai should also have a bug bounty pool, so that people can vote on what features/fixes they want. So basically the more votes for a specific request, the more likely (though not guaranteed) the request will be to get implemented.
And then they can add a tiered subscription system, so that the more you pay, the more votes you get for requesting specific bugs or features to be fixed.
Bug fixing should always be top priority and free of any charge , else the machine doesn't work as advertised
godlike wrote:Yes, I agree that we should not have to pay to fix the software. I am wondering more about advancing the software--this is where the subscription model could be helpful. In essence we would be paying to support the strengthening and growth of the software. For example, we could be on version 3.0 by now with a subscription model.
EnochLight wrote:Certified Beatz wrote:So this answer it all about subscription in the DAW field..
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vp1ALpWts98
Lol.. as soon as he said he thinks they sold Avid due to projected sales and “the banking issue”, I looked hard for the tin foil hat not in frame. But it’s cool that Pro Tools was his favorite “DEE AYE DOUBLE-YOU”. It’s certainly the best for sound engineering - I just don’t find it inspiring to work in.
B-Wise wrote:godlike wrote:Yes, I agree that we should not have to pay to fix the software. I am wondering more about advancing the software--this is where the subscription model could be helpful. In essence we would be paying to support the strengthening and growth of the software. For example, we could be on version 3.0 by now with a subscription model.
BYE!
godlike wrote:For example, we could be on version 3.0 by now with a subscription model.