
By MPC-Tutor
Sun Mar 01, 2026 9:33 am
A customer contacted me last night to request that I start using the same pad colour scheme that AKai have used for their kits in the MPC Live 3 and I was wondering what people think about this.
A little history. BAck in 2012 when Akai first released MPCs with the ability to set colours (Ren/Studio) their factory kits didn't use any consistent colour scheme (some just set all pads as red). So I decided to create my own colour scheme, which I have used consistently now for over 14 years across all my expansions.
In recent years Akai seem to have quietly adopted a colour scheme of their own, which (of course) is different to mine (only matching colour is red for kicks).
This customer believes that in order to claim compatibility with the MPC Live 3, I should be using the same pad colour scheme as akai. I disagree that pad colour is a compatibility issue, but I do understand the desire for consistency and muscle memory.
While I can change my colours to match Akai's (albeit it a tonne of work), I wonder if my existing customers would find this unnerving to have all their existing mpc-samples kits change colour. Are you happy to have one colour scheme for my kits, and one for Akai's? Do you care? Do you crave consistency? Interested to hear what people think.
Additionally, Akai's scheme is less granular. For example, hi hats and crashes are the same colour (brown) but mine are green and yellow respectively. Similarly Akai give snares and claps the same colour, but I differentiate. So moving to Akai's scheme would effectively be regressive in this respect as it doesn't provide that instant visual contrast on all articulations. The only solution I can think of is to adopt the basic kick/hat/snare colours, but then go off on my own on some stuff (maybe same colour but contrasting shades). But if it doesn't provide 1-2-1 consistency, is it worth moving at all?
It's a weird one, trying to adhere to a so called 'standard' when the suggested standard is inferior
A little history. BAck in 2012 when Akai first released MPCs with the ability to set colours (Ren/Studio) their factory kits didn't use any consistent colour scheme (some just set all pads as red). So I decided to create my own colour scheme, which I have used consistently now for over 14 years across all my expansions.
In recent years Akai seem to have quietly adopted a colour scheme of their own, which (of course) is different to mine (only matching colour is red for kicks).
This customer believes that in order to claim compatibility with the MPC Live 3, I should be using the same pad colour scheme as akai. I disagree that pad colour is a compatibility issue, but I do understand the desire for consistency and muscle memory.
While I can change my colours to match Akai's (albeit it a tonne of work), I wonder if my existing customers would find this unnerving to have all their existing mpc-samples kits change colour. Are you happy to have one colour scheme for my kits, and one for Akai's? Do you care? Do you crave consistency? Interested to hear what people think.
Additionally, Akai's scheme is less granular. For example, hi hats and crashes are the same colour (brown) but mine are green and yellow respectively. Similarly Akai give snares and claps the same colour, but I differentiate. So moving to Akai's scheme would effectively be regressive in this respect as it doesn't provide that instant visual contrast on all articulations. The only solution I can think of is to adopt the basic kick/hat/snare colours, but then go off on my own on some stuff (maybe same colour but contrasting shades). But if it doesn't provide 1-2-1 consistency, is it worth moving at all?
It's a weird one, trying to adhere to a so called 'standard' when the suggested standard is inferior




