temetrepo wrote:Eq, and a transient designer helps
poundaproblem wrote:Most importantly....start with a good sample! A crap snare will always be a crap snare.
poundaproblem wrote:start with a good sample!
Jfalconcrest wrote:Compression Dunny. Compression. Layering, Then compression.
Not that I have the crackliest snares ever, but I'm learning.
Lampdog wrote:Most likely the samples that we all use are already compressed.
Lampdog wrote:Jfalconcrest wrote:Compression Dunny. Compression. Layering, Then compression.
Not that I have the crackliest snares ever, but I'm learning.
Most likely the samples that we all use are already compressed.
Lampdog wrote:So you get bent outta shape huh? It's like that now?!?!
My icon was neutral. I didn't come at you sarcastically.
Rollin your eyes, lmao @ u.
Starting from scratch, hurray, but you didn't say that at the beginning and the op would have never know that
neither did I.
Honestly, is that the best you can come up with? Me going through everyones samples? I said most likely, as to not imply everyone like you implied I did.
Ur right to each their own.
Ur wrong, give a fk less about everyones style.
Destinite wrote:Lampdog wrote:Jfalconcrest wrote:Compression Dunny. Compression. Layering, Then compression.
Not that I have the crackliest snares ever, but I'm learning.
Most likely the samples that we all use are already compressed.
So if I take a snare off a break from some record from the 60s, that's compressed already?
