Studio One?

How many people in here use studio one? I know I do. I like how Studio One already has a clear sound to it and meets up and pro standards and it doesn't use as much RAM as Protools the only thing I don't like is how you assign the effects. Other than that the program is almost flawless.

Dz74 wrote:How many people in here use studio one? I know I do. I like how Studio One already has a clear sound to it and meets up and pro standards and it doesn't use as much RAM as Protools the only thing I don't like is how you assign the effects. Other than that the program is almost flawless.

Nice market on your product but... protools is the number one daw in the business followed by logic. If you dont have the ram to run the industry standard, get it and dont spam us with an ad

Woah, I aint spamming cuddi... I was jus stating my opinion on studio one and seeing if their was other users in here that also used it.
Personally, Pro-Tools is mad overrated and played out not saying it's a not a good program but I think Pro-Tools is just...overrated point blank. I use to mess with Pro-Tools myself but then I came across Studio One and at first I was skeptical but I started using it and I like the work flow of it and it doesn't use as much space.
Studio One ain't known by many yet, it's still fairly new but watch...in a couple or so years, you might see it gain some notoriety. Also Pro-Tools is a more of a mac user thing anyways

Dz74 wrote:Woah, I aint spamming cuddi... I was jus stating my opinion on studio one and seeing if their was other users in here that also used it.
Personally, Pro-Tools is mad overrated and played out not saying it's a not a good program but I think Pro-Tools is just...overrated point blank. I use to mess with Pro-Tools myself but then I came across Studio One and at first I was skeptical but I started using it and I like the work flow of it and it doesn't use as much space.
Studio One ain't known by many yet, it's still fairly new but watch...in a couple or so years, you might see it gain some notoriety. Also Pro-Tools is a more of a mac user thing anyways

you dont have a clue what you're talking about....

Dz74 wrote:Woah, I aint spamming cuddi... I was jus stating my opinion on studio one and seeing if their was other users in here that also used it.
Personally, Pro-Tools is mad overrated and played out not saying it's a not a good program but I think Pro-Tools is just...overrated point blank. I use to mess with Pro-Tools myself but then I came across Studio One and at first I was skeptical but I started using it and I like the work flow of it and it doesn't use as much space.
Studio One ain't known by many yet, it's still fairly new but watch...in a couple or so years, you might see it gain some notoriety. Also Pro-Tools is a more of a mac user thing anyways

Mac is also the most used computer in the bizz. Why? Proven track record. Protools has 2 users. Daw and control surface "desk" its not over rated its just reliable and proven. I would love to hear your over-rated point in example please. Im courious if you have a clue what your talking about.

wtf is studio one, never even heard of that thing..

Listen jo, I been messing with Pro-Tools for a minute when it first came to M-Audio Edition and like I said. Pro-Tools even though is a good program but Studio One is a better DAW IN MY OPINION.
I like the EQ and Compression settings that you don't have to do alot of Equing and compression and limiting to get the vocals sounding up to par nah mean? The program was designed to meet proffesional needs and is more quicker and on the go than Pro-Tools so I get work my mixes more complete faster than with Pro-Tools.
Like I said, I ain't hating on Pro-Tools but Pro-Tools was jus too slow and not as effecient for me especially with Studio One I could edit the vocals quicker without having to export it to another program just to clean it up at parts.
The only two things I don't like Studio One is how the effects are assigned to the track mixer instead of doing them idividually and no pitch shift opition but you can still add your VSTs and such so it's overall a great program. If you get a chance just to peep it instead of being a heard head jocking the industry, give it a shot.
Don't be so quick to judge a program when you ain't even tried it yet.

Dz74 wrote:Listen jo, I been messing with Pro-Tools for a minute when it first came to M-Audio Edition and like I said. Pro-Tools even though is a good program but Studio One is a better DAW IN MY OPINION.
I like the EQ and Compression settings that you don't have to do alot of Equing and compression and limiting to get the vocals sounding up to par nah mean? The program was designed to meet proffesional needs and is more quicker and on the go than Pro-Tools so I get work my mixes more complete faster than with Pro-Tools.
Like I said, I ain't hating on Pro-Tools but Pro-Tools was jus too slow and not as effecient for me especially with Studio One I could edit the vocals quicker without having to export it to another program just to clean it up at parts.
The only two things I don't like Studio One is how the effects are assigned to the track mixer instead of doing them idividually and no pitch shift opition but you can still add your VSTs and such so it's overall a great program. If you get a chance just to peep it instead of being a heard head jocking the industry, give it a shot.
Don't be so quick to judge a program when you ain't even tried it yet.

1. Doesn't that depend on the quality of the recorded vocals in the first place? (rhetorical question)
2. Workflow is a personal thing, it isn't tangible, it is also project specific.
3. It sounds like every other DAW known to man, but without a pitch shift feature, which is common place in the majority of others.
4. Why would anyone "peep" a program that doesn't have the features they already use in their current DAW?... I'm more than happy to "jock" the industry, and have a more efficient program... but thankyou for the heads up, you've given me another set of reasons to continue with Ableton.

again, you have no idea what you're talking about....Case in point:

I been messing with Pro-Tools for a minute when it first came to M-Audio Edition

This is not a very long time at all then....

I like the EQ and Compression settings that you don't have to do alot of Equing and compression and limiting to get the vocals sounding up to par nah mean?

Um, what?

The program was designed to meet proffesional needs and is more quicker and on the go than Pro-Tools so I get work my mixes more complete faster than with Pro-Tools.

Bullshit....

Pro-Tools was jus too slow and not as effecient for me especially with Studio One I could edit the vocals quicker without having to export it to another program just to clean it up at parts.

The problem isnt Pro Tools, you're just on a slow computer or a poorly-configured computer. And exporting to another program? If you cant get it right in one DAW exporting to another DAW isnt a magic pill. Thats a user error issue.

And this isnt about jocking the industry...I personally make good bread recording/Mixing. Theres no way studio one is going to put a dent in the pro tools market. There are so many session files I have to frequently send out and receive. Pro Tools is pretty much THE most recognized format. Thats not going to change any time soon. Overall the software is solid and works flawlessly when the end user knows how to enter the right commands. I've been editing on PT since '03....trust me...it works just fine.

One more thing, if I had to use other DAWs, Ableton and Logic would pretty much be the only real comparables. Everything else is just toy sh*t.

poundaproblem wrote:One more thing, if I had to use other DAWs, Ableton and Logic would pretty much be the only real comparables. Everything else is just toy sh*t.

You're right, when you gotta select preset EQs to do your work then its a toy.

At $500 I'd rather go with more known and tested software such as pro tools, reaper, live or logic..Been on this board for few years and never even heard anybody mention studio one until now



I love description for studio one artist 1.6 thou

(new1.5/1.6 features shown in red)
Studio One Artist is not a dumbed-down, “lite” version of Studio One Pro.

Well like I said, Pro-Tools is a good program especially if you're a mac user. In the end, it's all about the results of the song mixed. I wasn't tryna argue you guys made it into a argument, I was simply seeing if there was fellow studio one users...I jus stating IMO that Studio One is for me, I wasn't tryna force nobody to switch or convert. Oh well, do u imma do me

its actually a pretty cool DAW. I wouldnt go change your main program just because a new one came out, but its not bad at all. The people that code it have been writing DAWs and midi software for a long time. Though I would say all daws are pretty much the same and its about the user.

poundaproblem wrote:One more thing, if I had to use other DAWs, Ableton and Logic would pretty much be the only real comparables. Everything else is just toy sh*t.

normally I would agree with you, but I would hardly consider nuendo toy shit pound... though I am guessing you weren't thinking of that program at the time... reason is kind of like a toy, but that is my favourite part of it... it's fun, especially wiring the racks in improper ways, however I dont consider reason to be the same style of daw as pro tools and nuendo... oh, cubase (being similar to nuendo) is also quite good and also quite common.