jonestown massacre wrote:dabmeister wrote:Playing doesn't have the restrictions associated with sampling from the way I see it.
Isnt this the reason we still use mpc's when I could just cop reason and a midi controller and "learn to play"?
Ive "learned to play" my mpc like it was any other instrument. It helps, but I dont HAVE to know chord progressions and scales and the circle of fifths, etc. to smash pads and make sounds work together.
You dont know how many "musicians" would consider sample based producers non-artists. **** your guitar solo, Ill chop it, flip it, and serve you a beatdown with your own riffs. I worked in a music store, and 90% of the "musicians" I worked with only played cover songs, and then hated on me for trying to innovate.
No hate Dab, but c'mon man!
Well, another way of putting it would be...it takes more effort in putting together a tune if it's all sample based as opposed to just going at it from the top of your head with ideas and just laying them down.
Doesn't the process of editing, timestretching, pitching, or whatever it takes to get a sample to fit or work for a tune take time? I mean, I'm not hating on the art itself because I think there has been some nifty work done with flipping stuff or incorporating it into a compo to liven it up or take it to another level.
And after spending time at my boys crib last night, we had this discussion about samples and their ability to fit or work for a tune. He had some stuff he let me hear and it sounded like it was going to be hot until whatever added bass line came in and threw it all off.
I told him that the key signature his bass part was in wasn't matching or fitting with the rest of the tune. So I played out what I thought or sounded like what should have been laid down and he agreed that he liked it. I then suggested that he pick up his bass again and re-learn his key signatures.
I think it would have been much easier to play out what it is he was looking for, sample it, then incroporate it into the project.
Done deal!