Discuss the various methods you use in music production, from compressor settings to equipment type.

When mixing a track, do you...

3
16%
16
84%
By The Beat Conductor Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:02 pm
Just curious about which you prefer? and why?

By the way, do you do the same for EQing your drum sounds?
Last edited by The Beat Conductor on Thu Aug 18, 2005 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Smoove03 Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:11 pm
i just dont see it sounding the same on all systems if you put a mix on it just to make it louder. i suppose that would include boosting more on the high end which im not a huge fan of....

By ddot_SFV Thu Aug 18, 2005 8:12 pm
What do you mean by extremes of frequency ranges?

By The Beat Conductor Thu Aug 18, 2005 8:54 pm
ddot_SFV wrote:What do you mean by extremes of frequency ranges?


You boost all the way up for every frequency range (Low, Mid, High) before you begin messing with the frequencies.

Smoove03 wrote:i suppose that would include boosting more on the high end


Yes.

By morgan Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:38 am
The Beat Conductor wrote:
ddot_SFV wrote:What do you mean by extremes of frequency ranges?


You boost all the way up for every frequency range (Low, Mid, High) before you begin messing with the frequencies.


Boosting all frequencies is pretty much the same as turning the volume up, except you get real problems with phase at the crossover points. It's really not a good way to do anything. EQ is best used to cut, not boost. If you want your mix to sound louder, make it sound good so the person listening will turn it up.
User avatar

By TicToc Fri Aug 19, 2005 10:21 am
^^^ Co-sign.

EQing is more for removing trouble frequencies than boosting. Boosting leads to distortion, you cant distort by cutting.

A cut is worth a thousand boosts. Think of it like sculpture. You remove clay (or wood or whatever) until the shape looks right, not the other way around.
User avatar

By M.ic P.ro C.rusher Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:59 pm
TicToc wrote:Think of it like sculpture. You remove clay (or wood or whatever) until the shape looks right, not the other way around.



I like that analogy. 8) A LOT. 8) People, pay attention to this!
User avatar

By jaem Fri Aug 19, 2005 8:42 pm
rule of thumb (ie EQ 101)

remove offending freqs and boost volume

By The Beat Conductor Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:59 pm
When it comes to drums though boosting can be effective.

By ddot_SFV Sat Aug 20, 2005 5:42 am
Boosting all frequencies = turning up the track.

By morgan Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:08 am
The Beat Conductor wrote:When it comes to drums though boosting can be effective.


No. Weren't you listening?
By 4dahaterz Sat Aug 20, 2005 1:33 pm
There are a few good points made, but all depends on the person mixing, for instance, one person might use EQing in there advantage to cut and not boost, where as certain tracks someone might wanna add something on to that particular instrument, sound or voice... but it all depends on the persons personal preference as everything else always does :lol:
User avatar

By Smoove03 Sat Aug 20, 2005 2:48 pm
TicToc wrote:^^^ Co-sign.

EQing is more for removing trouble frequencies than boosting. Boosting leads to distortion, you cant distort by cutting.

A cut is worth a thousand boosts. Think of it like sculpture. You remove clay (or wood or whatever) until the shape looks right, not the other way around.


true!

By The Beat Conductor Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:04 pm
morgan wrote:
The Beat Conductor wrote:When it comes to drums though boosting can be effective.


No. Weren't you listening?


Stupid me! My bad! :lol:

jaem wrote:remove offending freqs and boost volume


:wink: